A Resource Sensitive Interpretation of Lexical Functional Grammar

This paper investigates whether the fundamental linguistic insights and intuitions of Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG), which is usually presented as a “constraint-based” linguistic theory, can be reformulated in a “resource sensitive” framework using a substructural modal logic. In the approach investigated here, LFG's f-descriptions are replaced with expressions from a multi-modal propositional logic (with permutation and possibly limited contraction). In effect, the feature structure “unification” basis of LFG's f-structures is replaced with a very different resource based mechanism. It turns out that some linguistic analyses that required non-monotonic devices in LFG (such as the “constraint equations” in the Andrews (1982) analysis of Icelandic) can be straightforwardly expressed in the framework presented here. Moreover, a Curry–Howard correspondence between proofs in this logic and λ-terms provides a semantic interpretation as a by-product of the process of showing syntactic well-formedness.

[1]  J.F.A.K. van Benthem,et al.  Language in Action: Categories, Lambdas and Dynamic Logic , 1997 .

[2]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  Intensional Verbs Without Type-Raising or Lexical Ambiguity , 1994, ArXiv.

[3]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  Linear Logic for Meaning Assembly , 1995, ArXiv.

[4]  D. Nute Classical vs Non-Classical Logics , 1980 .

[5]  Ronald M. Kaplan,et al.  The Interface between Phrasal and Functional Constraints , 1993, CL.

[6]  William C. Rounds,et al.  The logic of unification in grammar , 1990 .

[7]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Classical vs non-classical logics (the universality of classical logic) , 1994, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming.

[8]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  A Deductive Account of Quantification in LFG , 1994, ArXiv.

[9]  Michael Moortgat,et al.  Categorial Type Logics , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[10]  C. Pollard,et al.  Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2022 .

[11]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Features and Formulae , 1991, CL.

[12]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Type-driven semantic interpretation and feature dependencies in R-LFG , 1997, ArXiv.

[13]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  Quantifiers, Anaphora, and Intensionality , 1995, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[14]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Attribute-value logic and the theory of grammar , 1988 .

[15]  John T. Maxwell III,et al.  Constituent Coordination in Lexical-Functional Grammar , 1988, COLING 1988.

[16]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Fibred semantics for feature-based grammar logic , 1996, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[17]  Pauline Jacobson,et al.  Raising as function composition , 1990 .

[18]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Features and Agreement , 1995, ACL.

[19]  Jacob Hoeksema,et al.  TOPICS IN THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF INFINITIVES AND GERUNDS - CHIERCHIA,G , 1991 .

[20]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Cross-Serial Dependencies in Dutch , 1982 .

[21]  Miriam Butt,et al.  Syntactic Analyses for Parallel Grammars: Auxiliaries and Genitive NPs , 1996, COLING.

[22]  David R. Dowty On recent analyses of the semantics of control , 1985 .

[23]  J. Girard,et al.  Proofs and types , 1989 .

[24]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Features as Resources in R-LFG , 1997, ArXiv.

[25]  Mark Johnson Logic and Feature Structures , 1991, IJCAI.

[26]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  The syntax of anaphoric binding , 1993 .

[27]  William C. Rounds,et al.  Feature Logics , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[28]  B. Carpenter,et al.  Type-Logical Semantics , 1997 .

[29]  Jean-Yves Girard,et al.  Linear logic: its syntax and semantics , 1995 .

[30]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  The Semantics of Resource Sharing in Lexical-Functional Grammar , 1995, EACL.

[31]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[32]  Mark L. Johnson,et al.  Features and Agreement in Lambek Categorial Grammar , 1995 .

[33]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar , 1986, CSLI Lecture Notes.