A mixed-methods systematic review of patients' experience of being invited to participate in surgical randomised controlled trials.

[1]  Matthew L. Costa,et al.  Retrograde intramedullary nail fixation compared with fixed-angle plate fixation for fracture of the distal femur: the TrAFFix feasibility RCT. , 2019, Health technology assessment.

[2]  D. Charles,et al.  Recruitment and Retention in Clinical Trials of Deep Brain Stimulation in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease: Past Experiences and Future Considerations. , 2018, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[3]  D. Stocken,et al.  Gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for chemoradiation patients with head and neck cancer: the TUBE pilot RCT. , 2018, Health technology assessment.

[4]  D. Breen,et al.  Surveillance versus ablation for incidentally diagnosed small renal tumours: the SURAB feasibility RCT. , 2017, Health technology assessment.

[5]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[6]  T. Rapley,et al.  Equipoise across the patient population: optimising recruitment to a randomised controlled trial , 2017, Trials.

[7]  F. Griffiths,et al.  A process evaluation of the WHiTE Two trial comparing total hip arthroplasty with and without dual mobility component in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur , 2016, Bone & joint research.

[8]  K. Willett,et al.  The Ankle Injury Management (AIM) trial: a pragmatic, multicentre, equivalence randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation comparing close contact casting with open surgical reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in patients aged over 60 years. , 2016, Health technology assessment.

[9]  R. Horne,et al.  How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction) , 2016, Trials.

[10]  A. Nelson,et al.  Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy) , 2016, Trials.

[11]  M. Birchall,et al.  Patient perception of a randomised, controlled trial of laryngeal reinnervation versus thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. , 2015, The Journal of laryngology and otology.

[12]  J. Démonet,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Informed Consent in Innovative Therapy Research: Experience and Provisional Recommendations from a Multicenter Trial of Intracerebral Grafting , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Neal W. Dickert,et al.  Patients’ views of consent for research enrollment during acute myocardial infarction , 2015, Acute cardiac care.

[14]  R. Horne,et al.  Learning from the QUEST multicentre feasibility randomization trials in breast reconstruction after mastectomy , 2015, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  H. Leung,et al.  Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial to compare (deferred) androgen deprivation therapy and cryotherapy in men with localised radiation-recurrent prostate cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  J. N'Dow,et al.  Factors Influencing Women's Decision to Participate or Not in a Surgical Randomised Controlled Trial for Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence , 2013, BioMed research international.

[17]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Recruitment to clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation , 2013, Journal of health services research & policy.

[18]  Ale Algra,et al.  Trends in Worldwide Volume and Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[19]  P. Davidson,et al.  Assessment and management of adult cancer pain: a systematic review and synthesis of recent qualitative studies aimed at developing insights for managing barriers and optimizing facilitators within a comprehensive framework of patient care. , 2013, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[20]  D. Gopinath,et al.  Why don’t women participate? A qualitative study on non-participation in a surgical randomised controlled trial , 2013, International Urogynecology Journal.

[21]  R. Huddart,et al.  The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/07/011) , 2012, Trials.

[22]  S. Oliver,et al.  Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[23]  K. Kieburtz,et al.  Sham surgery controls in Parkinson's disease clinical trials: Views of participants , 2012, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[24]  C. May,et al.  'Let the computer choose?': the experience of participants in a randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy. , 2012, Sociology of health & illness.

[25]  K. Kieburtz,et al.  Comparison of enrollees and decliners of Parkinson disease sham surgery trials , 2012, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[26]  P. Chiang,et al.  Determinants of informed consent in a cataract surgery clinical trial: why patients participate. , 2012, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[27]  C. Pope,et al.  Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. , 2011, Health technology assessment.

[28]  G. Bepler,et al.  Lung Cancer Patients’ Decisions About Clinical Trials and the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2011, Journal of Cancer Education.

[29]  P. Zimmern,et al.  Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women , 2011, International Urogynecology Journal.

[30]  C. Jackson,et al.  Women’s views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the CARPET1 trial , 2010, Clinical trials.

[31]  J. Furuse,et al.  A conundrum for randomized controlled trials: experience from a small hepatocellular carcinoma trial. , 2010, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[32]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self , 2010, Trials.

[33]  C. May,et al.  Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS). , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[34]  E. Roos,et al.  Choosing surgery: patients' preferences within a trial of treatments for anterior cruciate ligament injury. A qualitative study , 2009, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[35]  T. Wyller,et al.  “I don’t like that, it’s tricking people too much…”: acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[36]  M. Jefford,et al.  Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[37]  I. Melo-Martín,et al.  Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[38]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Experiences of randomization: Interviews with patients and clinicians in the SPCG-IV trial , 2008, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[39]  S. Holm,et al.  Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach , 2007, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[40]  Victoria Lee,et al.  Continuity and change?: Exploring reactions to a guided self-management intervention in a randomised controlled trial for IBS with reference to prior experience of managing a long term condition , 2007, Trials.

[41]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth , 2006, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[42]  Jane M. Young,et al.  A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials. , 2006, Surgery.

[43]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[44]  B. Donnelly,et al.  Understanding participation in a trial comparing cryotherapy and radiation treatment. , 2005, The Canadian journal of urology.

[45]  O. Mortensen,et al.  Patients’ perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a questionnaire based survey of the consent process in the DANAMI-2 trial , 2004, Heart.

[46]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Applying systematic review methods to studies of people’s views: an example from public health research , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[47]  O. Mortensen,et al.  Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a Danish study. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[48]  R. Lilford,et al.  Trials in surgery , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[49]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[50]  Jenny L Donovan,et al.  "Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[51]  E. Hodnett,et al.  Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[52]  R. McLeod.  Issues in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials , 1999, World Journal of Surgery.

[53]  Jenny L Donovan,et al.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial , 1998, BMJ.

[54]  R. McLeod,et al.  Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: past, present and future , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[55]  B. Freedman.  Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[57]  S. Florescu,et al.  Chapter 4: Systematic Reviews of Text and Opinion , 2019 .

[58]  Kate Flemming,et al.  Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions , 2016 .

[59]  M. Conner,et al.  THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR , 2008 .

[60]  A. Coulter,et al.  Where are the patients in decision making about their own care , 2008 .

[61]  Mark Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[62]  1 Chapter 4 – Critical appraisal of qualitative research , 2022 .

[63]  A. Taft,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.