Detecting "Slippery Slope" and Other Argumentative Stances of Opposition Using Tree Kernels in Monologic Discourse

The aim of this study is to propose an innovative methodology to classify argumentative stances in a monologic argumentative context. Particularly, the proposed approach shows that Tree Kernels can be used in combination with traditional textual vectorization to discriminate between different stances of opposition without the need of extracting highly engineered features. This can be useful in many Argument Mining sub-tasks. In particular, this work explores the possibility of classifying opposition stances by training multiple classifiers to reach different degrees of granularity. Noticeably, discriminating support and opposition stances can be particularly useful when trying to detect Argument Schemes, one of the most challenging sub-task in the Argument Mining pipeline. In this sense, the approach can be also considered as an attempt to classify stances of opposition that are related to specific Argument Schemes.

[1]  Douglas Walton,et al.  A classification system for argumentation schemes , 2015, Argument Comput..

[2]  Paolo Torroni,et al.  Argument Mining: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2015, TAFA.

[3]  Paolo Torroni,et al.  CLAUDETTE: an automated detector of potentially unfair clauses in online terms of service , 2018, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[4]  Roberto Basili,et al.  KeLP: a Kernel-based Learning Platform for Natural Language Processing , 2015, ACL.

[5]  Paolo Torroni,et al.  Claim Detection in Judgments of the EU Court of Justice , 2015, AICOL.

[6]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Tree Kernels for Semantic Role Labeling , 2008, CL.

[7]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Semantic convolution kernels over dependency trees: smoothed partial tree kernel , 2011, CIKM '11.

[8]  Davide Liga,et al.  Argumentative Evidences Classification and Argument Scheme Detection Using Tree Kernels , 2019, ArgMining@ACL.

[9]  Guido Governatori,et al.  LegalRuleML: Design Principles and Foundations , 2015, Reasoning Web.

[10]  Serena Villata,et al.  Five Years of Argument Mining: a Data-driven Analysis , 2018, IJCAI.

[11]  Douglas Walton,et al.  The Basic Slippery Slope Argument , 2015 .

[12]  Eduard Hovy,et al.  Identifying Metaphorical Word Use with Tree Kernels , 2013 .

[13]  Alessandro Moschitti,et al.  Learning pairwise patterns in Community Question Answering , 2019, Intelligenza Artificiale.

[14]  Fiona Browne,et al.  Applying Kernel Methods to Argumentation Mining , 2012, FLAIRS.

[15]  Alessandro Moschitti,et al.  Convolution Kernels on Constituent, Dependency and Sequential Structures for Relation Extraction , 2009, EMNLP.

[16]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Structured Lexical Similarity via Convolution Kernels on Dependency Trees , 2011, EMNLP.

[17]  Alessandro Moschitti,et al.  Efficient Convolution Kernels for Dependency and Constituent Syntactic Trees , 2006, ECML.

[18]  Serena Villata,et al.  Argument Mining on Clinical Trials , 2018, COMMA.

[19]  Chris Reed,et al.  Argument Mining Using Argumentation Scheme Structures , 2016, COMMA.

[20]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis , 2003, ICTAI.

[21]  Paolo Torroni,et al.  MARGOT: A web server for argumentation mining , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Classifying arguments by scheme , 2011, ACL.