Decisionability: contending with information flow, information quality, and information, overload in economic intelligence

The importance of appropriate and adequate information toward decision making cannot be overemphasized. Considering the sheer volume of available information to information consumer and the rapidly advancing information management technologies facilitating corporate firms and organization to manage large and complex data sources aimed at exploring new opportunities towards strategic decision making. The age of inadequate information is gradually fading off while unconsciously introducing another concept known as “Information Overload”. Using adequate and timely available information for delivering strategic decisions is the focus of economic intelligence, however with ever increasing volume of information made available to the decision maker, the risk of indecision, forgetfulness, amongst others result. The consequent could be disastrous as the need arises for decision based on the interrelationship amongst the trio of decision situation, decision maker and the decision process in the face of information overload. The importance for knowledge reconciliation as the first step before information search has been proposed, this work attempts to establish the need for usage of ‘fine-tuned' information in taking strategic decisions.

[1]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  A. David,et al.  Prise en compte du profil de l'utilisateur dans un Système d'Information Stratégique , 2001 .

[3]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Information Quality - organizational, technological, and legal perspectives , 2004 .

[4]  James C. Collins,et al.  Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies , 1994 .

[6]  A. David,et al.  Modélisation de l'utilisateur, Systèmes d'Informations Stratégiques et Intelligence Economique , 2002 .

[7]  Zbigniew J. Gackowski A formal definition of operation quality of factors: a focus on data and information , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Qual..

[8]  Lynda Davies,et al.  Information in Action , 1991 .

[9]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[10]  K. Ishikawa What Is Total Quality Control , 1985 .

[11]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Richard Barrett,et al.  Building a values-driven organization : a whole system approach to cultural transformation , 2006 .

[13]  N. Bouaka,et al.  A proposal of a decision-maker problem to for a better understanding of information needs , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, 2004..

[14]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Colin Eden,et al.  Cognitive mapping and problem structuring for system dynamics model building , 1994 .

[16]  Amos David,et al.  METIORE: A Personalized Information Retrieval System , 2001, User Modeling.

[17]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Data quality in context , 1997, CACM.

[18]  Zbigniew J. Gackowski Quality of Informing: Credibility Provisional Model of Functional Dependencies , 2006 .

[19]  Wonjin Jung,et al.  A review of research: an investigation of the impact of data quality on decision performance , 2004, ISICT.

[20]  Mikhaila Burgess,et al.  Using quality criteria to assist in information searching , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Qual..

[21]  R. G. Hunt,et al.  Cognitive style and decision making , 1989 .

[22]  Effy Oz,et al.  Management Information Systems, Sixth Edition , 2008 .