Infant Sleep Machines and Hazardous Sound Pressure Levels

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Infant “sleep machines” (ISMs) produce ambient noise or noise to mask other sounds in an infant’s room with the goal of increasing uninterrupted sleep. We suggest that the consistent use of these devices raises concerns for increasing an infant’s risk of noise-induced hearing loss. We therefore sought to determine the maximum output levels of these sleep machines. METHODS: Sound levels of 14 ISMs played at maximum volume were measured at 30, 100, and 200 cm from the machine using correction factors to account for a 6-month-old’s ear canal. RESULTS: Maximum sound levels at 30 cm were >50 A-weighted dB for all devices, which is the current recommended noise limit for infants in hospital nurseries. Three machines produced output levels >85 A-weighted dB, which, if played at these levels for >8 hours, exceeds current occupational limits for accumulated noise exposure in adults and risks noise-induced hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: ISMs are capable of producing output sound pressure levels that may be damaging to infant hearing and auditory development. We outline recommendations for safer operation of these machines.

[1]  B. Kruger,et al.  An update on the external ear resonance in infants and young children. , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[2]  G. Gabrielsen,et al.  Autonomic response to auditory stimulation , 1993, Acta paediatrica.

[3]  Fei Gao,et al.  The effect of postnatal exposure to noise on sound level processing by auditory cortex neurons of rats in adulthood , 2009, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  James W. Hall,et al.  Recommended Permissible Noise Criteria for Occupied, Newly Constructed or Renovated Hospital Nurseries , 1999, Journal of Perinatology.

[5]  T. Field Cardiac and behavioral responses to repeated tactile and auditory stimulation by preterm and term neonates , 1979 .

[6]  J. Byrne,et al.  Psychophysiologic and behavioral response to auditory stimuli in the newborn , 1983 .

[7]  Blake C Papsin,et al.  Cochlear implants for children with severe-to-profound hearing loss. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Blake C Papsin,et al.  Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf. , 2013, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Edward F Chang,et al.  Environmental Noise Retards Auditory Cortical Development , 2003, Science.

[10]  L A Hayman,et al.  Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  E. Hock,et al.  Heart rate variability and cardiac response to an auditory stimulus. , 1974, Biology of the neonate.

[12]  S. Graven,et al.  Sound and the Developing Infant in the NICU: Conclusions and Recommendations for Care , 2000, Journal of Perinatology.

[13]  이수정 해외산업간호정보 - 미국 산업안전보건연구원(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 소개 , 2009 .

[14]  F G Shellock,et al.  Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Jiping Zhang,et al.  Noise exposure at young age impairs the auditory object exploration behavior of rats in adulthood , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  R Gädeke,et al.  THE NOISE LEVEL IN A CHILDRENS HOSPITAL AND THE WAKE‐UP THRESHOLD IN INFANTS , 1969, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[17]  M. Liberman,et al.  Acceleration of Age-Related Hearing Loss by Early Noise Exposure: Evidence of a Misspent Youth , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Josef Syka,et al.  Noise exposure during early development impairs the processing of sound intensity in adult rats , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.