Spatialization Design: Comparing Points and Landscapes

Spatializations represent non-spatial data using a spatial layout similar to a map. We present an experiment comparing different visual representations of spatialized data, to determine which representations are best for a non-trivial search and point estimation task. Primarily, we compare point-based displays to 2D and 3D information landscapes. We also compare a colour (hue) scale to a grey (lightness) scale. For the task we studied, point-based spatializations were far superior to landscapes, and 2D landscapes were superior to 3D landscapes. Little or no benefit was found for redundantly encoding data using colour or greyscale combined with landscape height. 3D landscapes with no colour scale (height-only) were particularly slow and inaccurate. A colour scale was found to be better than a greyscale for all display types, but a greyscale was helpful compared to height-only. These results suggest that point-based spatializations should be chosen over landscape representations, at least for tasks involving only point data itself rather than derived information about the data space.

[1]  Shinobu Ishihara.  Ishihara's test for colour-blindness , 1932 .

[2]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Information integration and the object display An interaction of task demands and display superiority , 1987 .

[3]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Using a Landscape Methaphor to Represent a Corpus of Documents , 1993, COSIT.

[4]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents , 1995, Proceedings of Visualization 1995 Conference.

[5]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[6]  Bernice E. Rogowitz,et al.  How not to lie with visualization , 1996 .

[7]  James T. Enns,et al.  High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing , 1996, TCHI.

[8]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Do Thematic Maps Improve Information Retrieval? , 1999, INTERACT.

[9]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  Spatial metaphors for browsing large data archives , 2000 .

[10]  Timothy Cribbin,et al.  Mapping semantic information in virtual space: dimensions, variance and individual differences , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[12]  Timothy Cribbin,et al.  Visual-spatial exploration of thematic spaces: a comparative study of three visualization models , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Ganesh S. Oak.  Information Visualization Introduction , 2022 .

[14]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments , 2002, CHI.

[15]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Visualization of Bibliographic Networks with a Reshaped Landscape Metaphor , 2002, VisSym.

[16]  Deborah Hix,et al.  Graphical encoding for information visualization: an empirical study , 2002, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002..

[17]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Testing the First Law of Cognitive Geography on Point-Display Spatializations , 2003, COSIT.

[18]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Distance–Similarity Metaphor in Network-Display Spatializations , 2004 .

[19]  N. Diakopoulos,et al.  ThemeExplorer : A Tool for Understanding the History of the Field of Information Visualization , 2004 .

[20]  Gregory B. Newby,et al.  Empirical Study of a 3D Visualization for Information Retrieval Tasks , 2004, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[21]  Wolfgang Kienreich,et al.  Evaluating a System for Interactive Exploration of Large, Hierarchically Structured Document Repositories , 2004 .

[22]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  Steerable, Progressive Multidimensional Scaling , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.

[23]  Elizabeth G. Hetzler,et al.  Analysis experiences using information visualization , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[24]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[25]  David M. Mark,et al.  The distance-similarity metaphor in region-display spatializations , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.