Communicating Price Information through Semantic Cues: The Moderating Effects of Situation and Discount Size

While several studies have examined how the specific wording (i.e., semantic cue) used to communicate a price offer affects consumers' perceptions of value, this area of research has not produced a set of consistent findings. To resolve the apparent inconsistencies, the current article builds on past research and explains why a consumer's response to a semantic cue depends on the situation (or decision context) and the discount size. The results of two studies are reported. The first experiment provides evidence that the relative effectiveness of two widely used types of semantic cues depends on both consumers' decision context and the level of processing evoked by the discount size. The second experiment replicates the semantic cue by situation interaction and demonstrates the robustness of this effect across store familiarity. Copyright 1996 by the University of Chicago.

[1]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Promotion Signal: Proxy for a Price Cut? , 1990 .

[2]  J. E. Swan,et al.  An application of the elaboration likelihood model , 1990 .

[3]  Dan C. Weilbaker,et al.  The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search , 1988 .

[4]  Scot Burton,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Cues on Consumer Perceptions of Reference Price Ads , 1991 .

[5]  E. Berkowitz,et al.  Contextual Influences on Consumer Price Responses: An Experimental Analysis , 1980 .

[6]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  Measuring Price Thresholds by Psychophysics and Latitudes of Acceptance , 1971 .

[7]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  A Study of Information Search Behavior during the Categorization of New Products , 1992 .

[8]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[9]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience , 1989 .

[10]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[11]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[12]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[13]  K. B. Monroe,et al.  Contextual influences on subjective price perceptions , 1977 .

[14]  H. L. Davis,et al.  Perception of Marital Roles in Decision Processes , 1974 .

[15]  Louise A. Heslop,et al.  Reference Prices and Deception in Newspaper Advertising , 1985 .

[16]  G. Stigler.  The Economics of Information , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers , 1990 .

[18]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[19]  R. Rosenthal.  Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[20]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice: Concepts and Research Methods , 1982 .

[21]  J. Gotlieb,et al.  The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-perceived Risk Relationship , 1994 .