Are large portions always bad? Using the Delboeuf illusion on food packaging to nudge consumer behavior

Exaggerated portion sizes are generally pictured on the front of product packaging in order to stimulate food craving and encourage consumer purchasing decisions. However, one problem with such images is that they can set inappropriate norms as far as food consumption is concerned and hence result in people serving themselves more than they otherwise might. The research reported here builds on the fact that depicting a food portion in a smaller (vs. larger) container (i.e., plate or bowl) creates the illusion of a larger (vs. smaller) portion, although the actual quantity of food remains the same (this is known as the Delboeuf illusion). Here, we demonstrate in two experiments that by presenting food in a smaller container (thus giving rise to the illusion of a relatively larger portion), participants have higher purchase intentions (study 1) and perceive the food as being more appetizing (study 2) but, crucially, decrease the size of the portion that they serve themselves (studies 1 and 2). Overall, by giving the impression of a larger portion on product packaging, the Delboeuf illusion could potentially be used to nudge consumers to find food more desirable, while at the same time leading them to reduce their serving, thus potentially benefitting both consumers and the food industry.

[1]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Pleasure and the Control of Food Intake: An Embodied Cognition Approach to Consumer Self‐Regulation , 2016 .

[3]  Aradhna Krishna,et al.  The 'Visual Depiction Effect' in Advertising: Facilitating Embodied Mental Simulation Through Product Orientation , 2012 .

[4]  B. Wansink,et al.  Depicted serving size: cereal packaging pictures exaggerate serving sizes and promote overserving , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[5]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Brain dynamics of meal size selection in humans , 2015, NeuroImage.

[6]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory Packaging : Designing New Product Experiences , 2020 .

[7]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[8]  I. Versluis,et al.  The Role of Social Norms in the Portion Size Effect: Reducing Normative Relevance Reduces the Effect of Portion Size on Consumption Decisions , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[9]  J. Anton,et al.  Taste at first (person) sight: Visual perspective modulates brain activity implicitly associated with viewing unhealthy but not healthy foods , 2018, Appetite.

[10]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Nudging Consumers toward Better Food Choices: Policy Approaches to Changing Food Consumption Behaviors , 2015 .

[11]  C. Spence,et al.  Changing the influence of portion size on consumer behavior via imagined consumption , 2017 .

[12]  E. Papies Tempting food words activate eating simulations , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  Effects of product unit image on consumption of snack foods , 2010 .

[14]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues , 2011, NeuroImage.

[15]  C. Tudur-Smith,et al.  Will smaller plates lead to smaller waists? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the effect that experimental manipulation of dishware size has on energy consumption , 2014, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[16]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Health and Pleasure in Consumers' Dietary Food Choices: Individual Differences in the Brain's Value System , 2016, PloS one.

[17]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action , 2000, Psychological science.

[18]  A. Akyol,et al.  Impact of three different plate colours on short-term satiety and energy intake: a randomized controlled trial , 2018, Nutrition Journal.

[19]  L. Duizer,et al.  See food diet? Cultural differences in estimating fullness and intake as a function of plate size , 2017, Appetite.

[20]  S. Holden,et al.  Whether Smaller Plates Reduce Consumption Depends on Who’s Serving and Who’s Looking: A Meta-Analysis , 2016, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[21]  Nicholas G. Shakeshaft,et al.  Measuring affective (liking) and non-affective (expected satiety) determinants of portion size and food reward , 2009, Appetite.

[22]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[23]  N. Martin,et al.  Is portion size selection associated with expected satiation, perceived healthfulness or expected tastiness? A case study on pizza using a photograph-based computer task , 2017, Appetite.

[24]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Why Visual Cues of Portion Size May Influence Intake , 2004, Obesity research.

[25]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Visual illusions and plate design: The effects of plate rim widths and rim coloring on perceived food portion size , 2013, International Journal of Obesity.

[26]  Cake or fruit? Influencing healthy food choice through the interaction of automatic and instructed mental simulation , 2016 .

[27]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  Pleasure as a Substitute for Size: How Multisensory Imagery Can Make People Happier with Smaller Food Portions , 2016 .

[28]  W. Sato,et al.  Fat Content Modulates Rapid Detection of Food: A Visual Search Study Using Fast Food and Japanese Diet , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[29]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Eating with our eyes: From visual hunger to digital satiation , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  B. Wansink,et al.  Plate Size and Color Suggestibility: The Delboeuf Illusion’s Bias on Serving and Eating Behavior , 2012 .