This review explores the empirical research on nontraditional instruction methods and their effects on reasoning development in college students in introductory biology. A search of primary databases found relatively few empirical studies, but eventually nine relevant empirical studies were identified. Findings suggest that inquiry-based, nontraditional collaborative instruction is more effective than traditional, lecture-based instruction in developing higher order reasoning skills in introductory college biology courses. Gains in reasoning do not appear to be achieved at the loss of content acquisition. Methods that emphasize writing have higher success in developing reasoning than methods that do not. Direct instruction in formal and informal reasoning leads to gains in those reasoning skill areas. Many questions about the strength of effects and how different instructional variables play a role in changing reasoning were apparent, but findings strongly support use of nontraditional inquiry-based collaborative methodologies for the development of student reasoning. (Contains 2 tables and 20 references.) (SLD) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. INSTRUCTIONAL APPROACHES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF REASONING IN INTRODUCTORY COLLEGE BIOLOGY COURSES: A REVIEW OF THE RESEARCH PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY .0cian le TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) IKI/1.5s document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. By Peter A. Daempfle, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Science Education Hobart and William Smith Colleges Scandling Center Box 4195 Geneva, NY 14456
[1]
Anton E. Lawson,et al.
Relationships among Level of Intellectual Development, Cognitive Style, and Grades in a College Biology Course.
,
1980
.
[2]
P. Pintrich,et al.
The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning
,
1997
.
[3]
K. Kitchener,et al.
Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series.
,
2009
.
[4]
Anton E. Lawson,et al.
Teaching formal reasoning in a college biology course for preservice teachers
,
1982
.
[5]
Diane Ebert-May,et al.
Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning
,
1997
.
[6]
J. Darrell Barnard,et al.
The lecture‐demonstration versus the problem‐solving method of teaching a college science course
,
1942
.
[7]
Robert D. Allen,et al.
Intellectual Development and the Understanding of Science: Applications of William Perry's Theory to Science Teaching.
,
1981
.
[8]
J. Piaget.
Science of education and the psychology of the child
,
1970
.
[9]
Marshall D. Sundberg,et al.
Decreasing course content improves student comprehension of science and attitudes towards science in freshman biology
,
1994
.
[10]
Donald A. Hall,et al.
A comparison of a biological sciences curriculum study (BSCS) laboratory and a traditional laboratory on student achievement at two private liberal arts colleges
,
1990
.