Community coalition project directors: what makes them effective leaders?

OBJECTIVE Effective leaders, both voluntary and paid, facilitate successful coalitions. The attributes that characterize effective project directors, however, are unclear. Our aim was to identify characteristics of effective project directors leading community coalitions. METHODS The study examined 13 project directors who led eight community-based coalitions established to combat substance abuse. We inductively identified common characteristics and leadership effectiveness of the project directors by abstracting data from detailed ethnographic studies of these coalitions. We assessed the validity of leadership effectiveness by comparing data abstracted from ethnographic studies with two independent ratings. We then employed a cross-case comparison strategy for analyzing patterns among the common characteristics identified and leadership effectiveness. Six characteristics emerged among the project directors studied: status with community (insider vs outsider); shared leadership; bridge building skills; substance abuse expertise; vision; and management style. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Shared leadership, bridge building skills, and insider status were consistently related to leadership effectiveness. Less support was found for substance abuse expertise or vision. When hiring project directors, coalition leaders may consider assessing whether candidates are "insiders" within the community and demonstrate shared leadership and bridge building skills.

[1]  C. Merzel,et al.  Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[2]  R. Lasker,et al.  Making the Most of Collaboration: Exploring the Relationship Between Partnership Synergy and Partnership Functioning , 2002, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[3]  S. Shortell,et al.  Evaluating Partnerships for Community Health Improvement: Tracking the Footprints , 2002, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[4]  R. Lasker,et al.  Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[5]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Evaluating Community-Based Collaborative Mechanisms: Implications for Practitioners , 2000 .

[6]  M. Kegler,et al.  Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[7]  M. Kegler,et al.  A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. , 1998, Health education research.

[8]  David Rindskopf,et al.  Think globally, act locally: Assessing the impact of community-based substance abuse prevention☆ , 1997 .

[9]  R M Goodman,et al.  Community Coalitions for Prevention and Health Promotion: Factors Predicting Satisfaction, Participation, and Planning , 1996, Health education quarterly.

[10]  David G. Altman,et al.  Characteristics and participant perceptions of tobacco control coalitions in California , 1993 .

[11]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. , 1993, Health education research.

[12]  R M Goodman,et al.  Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. , 1993, Health education research.

[13]  S. Fawcett,et al.  A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. , 2000, Annual review of public health.

[14]  Jellinek Ps,et al.  Fighting drug abuse at the local level. , 1991 .