THE ROLE OF PRESUMED PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS IN THE SIMULATION OF NONPREMIXED TURBULENT COMBUSTION

Flamelet-Progress-Variable (FPV) combustion models allow the evaluation of all thermochemical quantities in a reacting flow by computing only the mixture fraction Z and a progress variable C . When using such a method to predict turbulent combustion in conjunction with a turbulence model, a probability density function (PDF) is required to evaluate statistical averages (e. g., Favre averages) of chemical quantities. The choice of the PDF is a compromise between computational costs and accuracy level. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of the PDF choice and its modeling aspects to predict turbulent combustion. Three different models are considered: the standard one, based on the choice of a β -distribution for Z and a Dirac-distribution for C ; a model employing a β -distribution for both Z and C ; and the third model obtained using a β -distribution for Z and the statistically most likely distribution (SMLD) for C . The standard model, although widely used, does not take into account the interaction between turbulence and chemical kinetics as well as the dependence of the progress variable not only on its mean but also on its variance. The SMLD approach establishes a systematic framework to incorporate informations from an arbitrary number of moments, thus providing an improvement over conventionally employed presumed PDF closure models. The rational behind the choice of the three PDFs is described in some details and the prediction capability of the corresponding models is tested vs. well-known test cases, namely, the Sandia flames, and H2 -air supersonic combustion.

[1]  Joseph A. Wehrmeyer,et al.  Simultaneous temperature and multispecies measurement in a lifted hydrogen diffusion flame , 1992 .

[2]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of the HyShot II Scramjet , 2012 .

[3]  Ulrich Maas,et al.  Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space , 1992 .

[4]  J. Riley,et al.  A subgrid model for equilibrium chemistry in turbulent flows , 1994 .

[5]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Effects of thermal coupling and diffusion on the mechanism of H2 oxidation in steady premixed laminar flames , 1990 .

[6]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model: 1. A priori study and presumed PDF closure , 2008 .

[7]  Parviz Moin,et al.  An evaluation of the assumed beta probability density function subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulation of nonpremixed, turbulent combustion with heat release , 2000 .

[8]  Nasser Darabiha,et al.  Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion , 2000 .

[9]  Douglas Alan Schwer.  Numerical study of unsteadiness in non-reacting and reacting mixing layers , 1999 .

[10]  M. Rogers,et al.  A priori testing of subgrid models for chemically reacting non-premixed turbulent shear flows , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[12]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Assessment of two-equation turbulence models for transonic flows , 1994 .

[13]  S. Pope.  PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .

[14]  Stefan Heinz,et al.  Statistical mechanics of turbulent flows , 2003 .

[15]  C. Merkle,et al.  A Preconditioned Dual-Time, Diagonalized ADI Scheme for Unsteady Computations , 1997 .

[16]  Michele Napolitano,et al.  A RANS flamelet–progress-variable method for computing reacting flows of real-gas mixtures , 2010 .

[17]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model. 2. Application in LES of Sandia flames D and E , 2008 .

[18]  P. Moin,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  J. Steger,et al.  Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite-difference methods , 1981 .

[20]  C. J. Jachimowski,et al.  An analytical study of the hydrogen-air reaction mechanism with application to scramjet combustion , 1988 .

[21]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of local extinction and re-ignition effects in non-premixed turbulent combustion using a flamelet/progress variable approach , 2005 .

[22]  Van Oijen,et al.  Modelling of Premixed Laminar Flames using Flamelet-Generated Manifolds , 2000 .

[23]  Vincent Terrapon.  Flamelet-based model for supersonic combustion , 2009 .

[24]  C. Pierce,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion , 2001 .

[25]  T. Pulliam,et al.  A diagonal form of an implicit approximate-factorization algorithm , 1981 .