A hierarchical aggregate data model with spatially correlated disease rates.

The aggregate data study design (Prentice and Sheppard, 1995, Biometrika 82, 113-125) estimates individual-level exposure effects by regressing population-based disease rates on covariate data from survey samples in each population group. In this work, we further develop the aggregate data model to allow for residual spatial correlation among disease rates across populations. Geographical variation that is not explained by model predictors and has a spatial component often arises in studies of rare chronic diseases, such as breast cancer. We combine the aggregate and Bayesian disease-mapping models to provide an intuitive approach to the modeling of spatial effects while drawing correct inference regarding the exposure effect. Based on the results of simulation studies, we suggest guidelines for use of the proposed model.

[1]  David Clayton,et al.  Estimation of Population Exposure in Ecological Studies , 1996 .

[2]  Lianne Sheppard,et al.  Overcoming biases and misconceptions in ecological studies , 2001 .

[3]  D Hémon,et al.  Comparison of relative risks obtained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations. , 1987, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  R L Prentice,et al.  Design considerations for estimation of exposure effects on disease risk, using aggregate data studies. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Jon Wakefield,et al.  Ecological regression analysis of environmental benzene exposure and childhood leukaemia: sensitivity to data inaccuracies, geographical scale and ecological bias , 2001 .

[6]  L. Bernardinelli,et al.  Bayesian methods for mapping disease risk , 1996 .

[7]  J. Potter,et al.  Epidemiology of childhood leukemia, with a focus on infants. , 1994, Epidemiologic reviews.

[8]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[9]  Ross L. Prentice,et al.  Aggregate data studies of disease risk factors , 1995 .

[10]  Jon Wakefield,et al.  Sensitivity Analyses for Ecological Regression , 2003, Biometrics.

[11]  John A. Michon,et al.  Design considerations , 1993, Generic Intelligent Driver Support.

[12]  L. Sheppard,et al.  On the reliability and precision of within- and between- population estimates of relative rate parameters. , 1995, Biometrics.

[13]  A. Molli'e.  Bayesian mapping of disease , 1996 .

[14]  J. Robins,et al.  Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  On the accommodation of disease rate correlations in aggregate data studies of disease risk factors. , 1998, Biometrics.

[16]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Applied Statistics , 1953, Nature.

[17]  W. Gilks,et al.  Adaptive Rejection Sampling for Gibbs Sampling , 1992 .

[18]  Ruth Salway,et al.  A statistical framework for ecological and aggregate studies , 2001 .

[19]  Lianne Sheppard,et al.  Insights on bias and information in group-level studies. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[20]  S. Richardson,et al.  Ecological correlation studies , 2001 .

[21]  J. Wakefield,et al.  Bayesian approaches to disease mapping , 2001 .

[22]  D. Clayton,et al.  Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. , 1987, Biometrics.

[23]  Patrick J. Heagerty,et al.  Window Subsampling of Estimating Functions with Application to Regression Models , 2000 .

[24]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Bayesian mapping of disease , 1995 .

[25]  O. Zyryanova,et al.  Ecological Studies , 1911, Nature.