A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.

Mechanisms of visual extinction were investigated in four patients with right hemisphere damage using a partial report paradigm. Different shapes (star or triangle) were displayed in one, two or four possible locations so that double simultaneous stimuli occurred either across the two hemifields or within the same hemifield. Patients attended either to the location (right, left or both), number (one, two or four) or shape (no, one or two stars among the shapes presented) of stimuli in three separate experiments using the same displays and exposure duration. Reporting the location (Experiment 1) produced marked contralesional extinction, although reaction time was delayed compared with unilateral right trials, indicating unconscious processing. Reaction time was also delayed on correct bilateral and unilateral left trials. In contrast, enumerating stimuli (Experiment 2) caused no significant contralesional extinction on bilateral displays and reaction time was similar on bilateral and unilateral right trials, suggesting that information from both fields was grouped in a single numerable percept in this task. However, patients often detected only one of two stimuli within the left field. Whereas similarity of shapes improved localization and did not affect enumeration, identifying stars among shapes (Experiment 3) revealed a severe inability to detect two similar targets between hemifields as well as within each of the hemifields. Distracting triangles were generally less detrimental to the perception of a concurrent target on either side, but slowed the reaction time regardless of whether they were in the same or the opposite field. Relative difficulty in ignoring distractors correlated with neglect severity on a cancellation task, and was most prominent in one patient with a large amount of frontal damage. These findings suggest that (i) allocation of attention to identical stimuli can be modulated by task demand; (ii) enumerating a small set of items across fields may not require attending to individual stimuli but relies on preattentive subitizing ability, as found in normal subjects; (iii) location information may be critical for attentional mechanisms subserved by the parietal cortex and pathological competition for awareness in extinction; (iv) extinction entails a bilateral deficit in attending to two concurrent similar targets when their features must be identified; and (v) the relevance of the stimuli can modulate the distribution of attention, possibly through frontal top-down control. These findings are consistent with recent neurophysiological evidence of parietal and frontal attentional influences on ventral visual pathways.

[1]  M. B. Bender,et al.  Phenomena of fluctuation, extinction and completion in visual perception. , 1946 .

[2]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  D. Denny-Brown,et al.  The significance of perceptual rivalry resulting from parietal lesion. , 1952, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  E. Bay Disturbances of visual perception and their examination. , 1953, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[6]  M. Critchley The parietal lobes , 1966 .

[7]  H. Birch,et al.  Delayed information processing and extinction following cerebral damage. , 1967, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  F. Campbell,et al.  The Magic Number 4 ± 0: A New Look at Visual Numerosity Judgements , 1976, Perception.

[9]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Information processing of visual stimuli in an ‘extinguished’ field , 1979, Nature.

[10]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980 .

[12]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[16]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M. Mesulam Principles of behavioral neurology , 1985 .

[19]  J D Holtzman,et al.  Components of visual attention. Alterations in response pattern to visual stimuli following parietal lobe infarction. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[22]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[23]  M. Kinsbourne Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[24]  H Egeth,et al.  Subitizing: Direct apprehension or serial processing? , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Y Tsal,et al.  Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  I. Robertson Anomalies in the laterality of omissions in unilateral left visual neglect: Implications for an attentional theory of neglect , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  K M Heilman,et al.  Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[29]  E. Renzi,et al.  Patterns of neglect dissociation. , 1989, Behavioural neurology.

[30]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[31]  G Vallar,et al.  Influence of response modality on perceptual awareness of contralesional visual stimuli. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neglect as a neural representation deficit. , 1990, Revue neurologique.

[34]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[35]  M. Verfaellie,et al.  Effects of changes in stimulus contingency on visual extinction , 1990, Neurology.

[36]  M. Farah,et al.  Unconscious perception of “extinguished” visual stimuli: Reassessing the evidence , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  J. D. Balakrishnan,et al.  Is subitizing a unique numerical ability? , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. Paillard Brain and space , 1991 .

[39]  M. Verfaellie,et al.  Changing attentional demands in left hemispatial neglect. , 1991, Archives of neurology.

[40]  Jon Driver,et al.  Levels of processing for visual stimuli in an “extinguished” field , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Mark Mennemeier,et al.  A stimulus-response relationship in unilateral neglect: The power function , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  B H Price,et al.  Dissociated perceptual-sensory and exploratory-motor neglect. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[43]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[44]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  R. Rafal,et al.  Visual Extinction and Stimulus Repetition , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[48]  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993 .

[49]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Location dominance in attending to color and shape. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[52]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  Jon Driver,et al.  Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection , 1994 .

[54]  G Vallar,et al.  Anatomical correlates of visual and tactile extinction in humans: a clinical CT scan study. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[55]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  When does “no” really mean “yes”? A case study in unilateral visual neglect , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[57]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. , 1994 .

[58]  R. Andersen Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[60]  E. Renzi,et al.  An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  H. Pashler,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Selecting successive visual objects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[63]  M. A. Steinmetz,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for a role of posterior parietal cortex in redirecting visual attention. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[64]  Jon Driver,et al.  Object segmentation and visual neglect , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[65]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Input and Response Determinants of Visual Extinction: A Case Study , 1996, Cortex.

[66]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Long-range interactions in visual perception , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[67]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Implicit redundant-targets effect in visual extinction , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection , 1996 .

[69]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Preattentive Filling-in of Visual Surfaces in Parietal Extinction , 1997, Science.

[70]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[71]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[72]  C. Kennard,et al.  Distractor-dependent frontal neglect , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  A. Treisman,et al.  The Interaction of Spatial and Object Pathways: Evidence from Balint's Syndrome , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  C. Kennard,et al.  Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients , 1997, Nature.

[75]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Orienting to Extinguished Signals in Hemispatial Neglect , 1998 .

[76]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Neural representation of objects in space: a dual coding account. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[77]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[78]  S. Lewis,et al.  Recovery from visuospatial neglect in stroke patients , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[79]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  T Landis,et al.  Illusory contours and spatial neglect , 1998, Neuroreport.

[81]  Earl K. Miller,et al.  Selective representation of relevant information by neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[82]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998 .

[83]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[84]  R. Rafal,et al.  "Both" means more than "two": localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[85]  G Humphreys,et al.  Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[86]  J. Duncan,et al.  Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. , 1999 .

[87]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[88]  M. Mesulam Attentional networks, confusional states, and neglect syndromes. , 2000 .

[89]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .