Internal standards revisited: Effects of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction

Abstract Two studies examined the effect of two comparison processes on perceptions of fairness and satisfaction. Rewards relative to others (social comparison) and relative to expectancies (expectancy comparison) were orthogonally varied while absolute level of reward was held constant. Both studies showed, contrary to previous theory, that only social comparisons are related to perceived fairness, yet both comparisons are significantly related to satisfaction in an additive manner. Social comparisons explained more variation in satisfaction and dominated responses to more specific measures of affect. Partial support for specific predictions derived from equity theory and expectancy theory are reported. The overall results are interpreted as demonstrating the importance of the salience of frames of reference in reward evaluation. Estabilished practices create expectations, and since men have traditionally received greater rewards than women for the same services, they expect disproportionate rewards and tend to be disappointed if they do not get them. But these expectations have nothing to do with investments, and neither are they rooted in a conception of justice. ( Blau, 1964, p. 195)

[1]  J. Freedman.  Role playing: Psychology by consensus. , 1969 .

[2]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[3]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[4]  K. Weick,et al.  Preferences among forms of equity , 1968 .

[5]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Equity theory: A review and critique. , 1969 .

[6]  P. Goodman.  An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay , 1974 .

[7]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .

[8]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[9]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[10]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[11]  William G. Austin,et al.  COMMENT ON LANE AND MESSE'S CONFUSING CLARIFICATION OF EQUITY THEORY1 , 1974 .

[12]  I. Lane,et al.  Distribution of Insufficient, Sufficient, and Oversufficient Rewards: A Clarification of Equity Theory. , 1972 .

[13]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[14]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[15]  E. Walster,et al.  REACTIONS TO CONFIRMATIONS AND DISCONFIRMATIONS OF EXPECTANCIES OF EQUITY AND INEQUITY , 1974 .

[16]  E. Lawler.  Equity theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality. , 1968 .

[17]  James A. Davis,et al.  A Formal Interpretation of the Theory of Relative Deprivation , 1959 .

[18]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  The concept of equity in the perception of pay. , 1966 .

[19]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[20]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. , 1949 .

[21]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .