FLEXIQuant-LF to quantify protein modification extent in label-free proteomics data

Improvements in LC-MS/MS methods and technology have enabled the identification of thousands of modified peptides in a single experiment. However, protein regulation by post-translational modifications (PTMs) is not binary, making methods to quantify the modification extent crucial to understanding the role of PTMs. Here, we introduce FLEXIQuant-LF, a software tool for large-scale identification of differentially modified peptides and quantification of their modification extent without knowledge of the types of modifications involved. We developed FLEXIQuant-LF using label-free quantification of unmodified peptides and robust linear regression to quantify the modification extent of peptides. As proof of concept, we applied FLEXIQuant-LF to data-independent-acquisition (DIA) data of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) during mitosis. The unbiased FLEXIQuant-LF approach to assess the modification extent in quantitative proteomics data provides a better understanding of the function and regulation of PTMs. The software is available at https://github.com/SteenOmicsLab/FLEXIQuantLF.

[1]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[2]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[3]  Bin Zhang,et al.  PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Wes McKinney,et al.  Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.

[5]  Spiros Michalakopoulos,et al.  Comprehensive quantification of the modified proteome reveals oxidative heart damage in mitochondrial heteroplasmy , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  K. Lage,et al.  Quantitative maps of protein phosphorylation sites across 14 different rat organs and tissues , 2012, Nature Communications.

[7]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[8]  Oliver M. Bernhardt,et al.  Extending the Limits of Quantitative Proteome Profiling with Data-Independent Acquisition and Application to Acetaminophen-Treated Three-Dimensional Liver Microtissues* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[9]  S. Gygi,et al.  Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  A. Heck,et al.  Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  M. Mann,et al.  Ultradeep human phosphoproteome reveals a distinct regulatory nature of Tyr and Ser/Thr-based signaling. , 2014, Cell reports.

[13]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Enhancing the Identification of Phosphopeptides from Putative Basophilic Kinase Substrates Using Ti (IV) Based IMAC Enrichment* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Hanno Steen,et al.  FLEXIQuant: a novel tool for the absolute quantification of proteins, and the simultaneous identification and quantification of potentially modified peptides. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[16]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Control of mitotic transitions by the anaphase-promoting complex. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[18]  D R Mani,et al.  Refined Preparation and Use of Anti-diglycine Remnant (K-ε-GG) Antibody Enables Routine Quantification of 10,000s of Ubiquitination Sites in Single Proteomics Experiments* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[19]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  A large-scale method to measure absolute protein phosphorylation stoichiometries , 2011, Nature Methods.

[20]  Chika Yokota,et al.  Tiki1 Is Required for Head Formation via Wnt Cleavage-Oxidation and Inactivation , 2012, Cell.

[21]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  The quantitative proteome of a human cell line , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  D. B. Kristensen,et al.  Mapping of phosphorylated proteins on two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gels using protein phosphatase , 2002, Proteomics.

[23]  J. Rush,et al.  Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Different phosphorylation states of the anaphase promoting complex in response to antimitotic drugs: A quantitative proteomic analysis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Kornhauser,et al.  PhosphoSite: A bioinformatics resource dedicated to physiological protein phosphorylation , 2004, Proteomics.

[26]  Hanno Steen,et al.  FLEXITau: Quantifying Post-translational Modifications of Tau Protein in Vitro and in Human Disease. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  F Wold,et al.  In vivo chemical modification of proteins (post-translational modification). , 1981, Annual review of biochemistry.

[28]  Marc Kirchner,et al.  A Practical Guide to the FLEXIQuant Method , 2012, Quantitative Methods in Proteomics.

[29]  Sarah Lin,et al.  TagGraph reveals vast protein modification landscapes from large tandem mass spectrometry data sets , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  John Chilton,et al.  Using iRT, a normalized retention time for more targeted measurement of peptides , 2012, Proteomics.

[31]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[32]  Chunaram Choudhary,et al.  The growing landscape of lysine acetylation links metabolism and cell signalling , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[33]  Kasper Engholm-Keller,et al.  Comprehensive Quantitative Comparison of the Membrane Proteome, Phosphoproteome, and Sialiome of Human Embryonic and Neural Stem Cells* , 2013, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  J. Steen,et al.  Co‐regulation proteomics reveals substrates and mechanisms of APC/C‐dependent degradation , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[35]  Oliver M. Bernhardt,et al.  Optimization of Experimental Parameters in Data-Independent Mass Spectrometry Significantly Increases Depth and Reproducibility of Results* , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[36]  A FischlerMartin,et al.  Random sample consensus , 1981 .

[37]  Heiko Horn,et al.  In Vivo Phosphoproteomics Analysis Reveals the Cardiac Targets of β-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling , 2013, Science Signaling.

[38]  Craig D Wenger,et al.  Phosphoproteomics for the masses. , 2010, ACS chemical biology.

[39]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[40]  Hanno Steen,et al.  FLEXIQinase, a mass spectrometry-based assay, to unveil multi-kinase mechanisms , 2012, Nature Methods.

[41]  Michael R Shortreed,et al.  Enhanced Global Post-translational Modification Discovery with MetaMorpheus. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.