Rear seat safety for children aged 4-12: identifying the real-world needs towards development of countermeasures

This study summarizes a joint research project aiming to further enhance the safety of booster-seated children (aged 4-12) in the rear seat of passenger cars. The focus is real-world aspects of child safety, comprising the whole context of the vehicle and child restraints, and a variety of crash situations, including pre-crash events. Real children sit in a variety of sitting postures in cars. On-road driving studies show that children take different postures due to comfort, visibility or activities. The results from three studies 18 children in a variety of restraints, showed that for only a portion of the time, they are sitting upright with contact to the seatback, i.e. similar to the standardized crash test dummy position. When using a booster with protruding head side supports the children sit forward leaning more than without, and in a large share of the time, the head is in front of the head side supports. Approximately 40% of the crashes are preceded by evasive maneuvers. When exposing child volunteers to evasive braking they will move forward by up to 0.2m, when shoulder belt remains over the shoulder. Thirty four child volunteers were exposed to evasive braking and steering events, using different types of boosters. Depending of the size of the child and the booster used, they might slide out of the shoulder belt in steering events. In addition, existing child crash test dummies were tested and compared to the volunteer data. The volunteer data was also used to validate an active child Human Body Model, as a first step to develop a tool that can be used for evasive maneuvers. The booster is essential for the child enabling good interaction to the seatbelt. In addition, the vehicle protection systems play an important role for the child protection. Hence, for enhancing real-world safety it is essential to replicate in-vehicle situations. Unfortunately, this is not how child restraints are certified today. This study shows that child crash test dummies benefit from side airbags and advanced seatbelt technologies, and are responsive to changes in sitting postures and crash modes. In addition to the in-crash protective systems evaluated in this study, pioneering maneuver and run-off-road tests with crash test dummies were run to evaluate the effect of an electrical reversible seatbelt retractor (pre-pretensioner) to help keep the occupant in the belt during such an event. International multidisciplinary workshops were held and concluded that future advancements need to be data driven and incorporate multiple disciplines. Engineering advancements should strive towards less complex solutions and the shared responsibility between the child restraint and the vehicle was highlighted. The results from this project contribute to identification and quantification of important real-world needs, as well as evaluation and development of countermeasures. It is concluded, that from a real-world perspective, the vehicle and child restraint should be designed together targeting a range of acceptable common user positions; sitting postures preferably guided by comfort and positive means. Such designs will ensure robust function of the protection systems for these young occupants, and advance the development of countermeasures that protect children in real- world crashes, also including dynamic events prior to a crash.

[1]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  Kinematics and shoulder belt engagement of children on belt-positioning boosters during evasive steering maneuvers , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[2]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  Seat belt pre-pretensioner effect on child-sized dummies during run-off-road events , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[3]  Helen Loeb,et al.  Naturalistic driving study of rear seat child occupants: Quantification of head position using a Kinect™ sensor , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  Irene Isaksson-Hellman,et al.  Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  Katarina Bohman,et al.  Long-Term Medical Consequences for Child Occupants 0 to 12 Years Injured in Car Crashes , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[6]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  Kinematics and Shoulder Belt Position of Child Anthropomorphic Test Devices During Steering Maneuvers , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Marianne Andersson,et al.  Rear Seat Child Safety in Near-Side Impacts: A Modeling Study of Common Sitting Positions , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Karin Brolin,et al.  Kinematics of Child Volunteers and Child Anthropomorphic Test Devices During Emergency Braking Events in Real Car Environment , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Marianne Andersson,et al.  Parameter Study for Child Injury Mitigation in Near-Side Impacts Through FE Simulations , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[10]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  Characteristics of crashes involving injured children in side impacts , 2011 .

[11]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  Head Injury Causation Scenarios for Belted, Rear-Seated Children in Frontal Impacts , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  Jason Forman,et al.  Rear seat occupant safety: an investigation of a progressive force-limiting, pretensioning 3-point belt system using adult PMHS in frontal sled tests. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[13]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Effectiveness of Belt Positioning Booster Seats: An Updated Assessment , 2009, Pediatrics.

[14]  Ola Boström,et al.  Rear seat occupant thorax protection in near side impacts. , 2009, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[15]  Anna-Lisa Osvalder,et al.  Misuse of booster cushions - an observation study of children's performance during buckling up. , 2008, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[16]  Basem Y. Henary,et al.  Car safety seats for children: rear facing for best protection , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[17]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Injury causation scenarios in belt-restrained nearside child occupants. , 2007, Stapp car crash journal.

[18]  N. Praxl,et al.  A Computational Human Model With Stabilizing Spine: A Step Towards Active Safety , 2007 .

[19]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Field Investigation of Child Restraints in Side Impact Crashes , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  Björn Lundell,et al.  Safety for the Growing Child – Experiences from Swedish Accident Data , 2005 .

[21]  Martha Warren Bidez,et al.  Kinematics, Injury Mechanisms and Design Considerations for Older Children in Adult Torso Belts , 2001 .

[22]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  Trends and Effects of Child Restraint Systems Based on Volvo's Swedish Accident Database , 1997 .

[23]  Kathleen D. Klinich,et al.  SURVEY OF OLDER CHILDREN IN AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINTS , 1994 .

[24]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The Protective Effects of Rearward Facing CRS: An Overview of Possibilities and Problems Associated with Child Restraints for Children Aged 0-3 Years , 1993 .

[25]  Richard L. Stalnaker,et al.  Spinal cord injuries to children in real world accidents , 1993 .

[26]  Petter Nilsson,et al.  IMPROVING REAR SEAT SAFETY - A CONTINUING PROCESS , 1993 .

[27]  H Norin,et al.  Rearward-facing child seats--the safest car restraint for children? , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  C Tingvall,et al.  Some aspects of the safety of children as car passengers in road traffic accidents , 1987, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[29]  Hans Norin,et al.  Child Restraints in Cars - An Approach to Safe Family Transportation , 1979 .

[30]  D F Huelke,et al.  Infants and children in the adult world of automobile safety design: pediatric and anatomical considerations for design of child restraints. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  Kinematics and Shoulder Belt Engagement of Children on Belt-Positioning Boosters during Emergency Braking Events , 2017 .

[32]  Isabelle Stockman,et al.  Safety for Children in Cars – Focus on Three Point Seatbelts in Emergency Events , 2016 .

[33]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  Review of Child Car Occupant Fatalities in Sweden During Six Decades , 2013 .

[34]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  Child Occupant Protection: Latest Knowledge and Future Opportunities – Results of a 2015 Workshop in Gothenburg, Sweden , 2013 .

[35]  Caitlin M. Locey,et al.  Relative kinematics of the shoulder belt and the torso: comparison of the Q10 ATD and pediatric human volunteers , 2013 .

[36]  Isabelle Stockman,et al.  Child passenger kinematics in emergency manoeuvres , 2012 .

[37]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  Older children's sitting postures when riding in the rear seat , 2011 .

[38]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Kinematics and shoulder belt position of child rear seat passengers during vehicle maneuvers. , 2011, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[39]  Anna-Lisa Osvalder,et al.  Effect of Booster Seat Design on Children's Choice of Seating Positions During Naturalistic Riding. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[40]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  Rear Seat Safety for the Growing Child: A New 2-Stage Integrated Booster Cushion , 2007 .

[41]  Ola Boström,et al.  The effect of a Pretensioner and a Load Limiter on a HIII 6Y, Seated on Four Different Types of Booster Cushions in Frontal Impacts , 2006 .

[42]  Claude Tarriere,et al.  Children are not miniature adults , 1995 .