In this paper, we consider the problem of improving the detection of a device by another device in mobile ad hoc networks, given a maximum amount of time that they remain in proximity of each other. Our motivation lies in the emergence of a new trend of mobile applications known as proximity-based mobile applications which enable a user to communicate with other users in some defined range and for a certain amount of time. The highly dynamic nature of these applications makes neighbor detection time-constrained, i.e., even if a device remains in proximity for a limited amount of time, it should be detected with a high probability as a neighbor. To address this problem, we perform a realistic simulation-based study in mobile ad hoc networks and we consider three typical urban environments where proximity-based mobile applications are used, namely indoor with hard partitions, indoor with soft partitions and outdoor urban areas. In our study, a node periodically broadcasts a message in order be detected as a neighbor. Thus, we study the effect of parameters that we believe could influence the detection probability, i.e., the transmission power and the time interval between two consecutive broadcasts. More precisely, for each environment, we determine when a change in the value of each of these parameters could lead to an improvement of the neighbor detection and when it hurts. Our experiments show that there exists no unique combination of values of these parameters that maximizes the detection probability in all environments. Accordingly, for each environment, we present the combination that maximizes the detection probability in that environment.
[1]
Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.
Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice (2nd Edition) by
,
2012
.
[2]
Paolo Santi,et al.
Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication: Fair Transmit Power Control for Safety-Critical Information
,
2009,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
[3]
Ingrid Moerman,et al.
On the feasibility of utilizing smartphones for vehicular ad hoc networking
,
2011,
2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.
[4]
Qi Chen,et al.
Overhaul of ieee 802.11 modeling and simulation in ns-2
,
2007,
MSWiM '07.
[5]
Raja Sengupta,et al.
Vehicle-to-vehicle safety messaging in DSRC
,
2004,
VANET '04.
[6]
Felix Schmidt-Eisenlohr,et al.
IEEE 802.11-based one-hop broadcast communications: understanding transmission success and failure under different radio propagation environments
,
2006,
MSWiM '06.
[7]
Martin Nilsson,et al.
Investigating the energy consumption of a wireless network interface in an ad hoc networking environment
,
2001,
Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).
[8]
Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.
Wireless communications - principles and practice
,
1996
.
[9]
Jinsong Zhang,et al.
Reliability Analysis of One-Hop Safety-Critical Broadcast Services in VANETs
,
2011,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.