The Vocal Sac Increases Call Rate in the Túngara Frog Physalaemus pustulosus

In most anurans, the production of advertisement calls is accompanied by the inflation of a vocal sac. Current functions of the vocal sac, however, are not fully understood, although several hypotheses have been proposed. One hypothesis suggests that the vocal sac decreases the intercall interval (i.e., increases call rate) by reinflating the lungs more rapidly than is possible with the buccal pump. We investigate this hypothesis by analyzing audio and video recordings of calling túngara frogs. We compare the first two call bouts emitted by an originally uninflated male. The first call bout requires lung inflation via buccal pumping, but in the second, the male is already inflated because of capture of air and reinflation of the lungs by the vocal sac. Lung inflation to typical field levels requires 26–51 buccal pumps, which takes at least 4.4 s. This estimate is more than 2.5 times the typical intercall interval with lung reinflation via a vocal sac (ca. 1.7 s). Evidence from phonotaxis tests demonstrates that these differences in intercall intervals are salient to females and that female Physalaemus pustulosus prefer the shorter intercall interval/higher call rate. Acoustic analyses demonstrate that the first call of bout 1, which requires buccal pumping, is usually shorter, of lower amplitude, and spans a smaller frequency range than the first call of bout 2, which does not require buccal pumping. Because females prefer longer, more intense calls, these results suggest that the vocal sac not only increases call rate but also allows males to produce more calls of increased attractiveness to females.

[1]  Carl Gans,et al.  On the mechanism of respiration in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana: A reassessment , 1969 .

[2]  W. Watkins,et al.  The Call of Eleutherodactylus johnstonei, the Whistling Frog of Bermuda , 1970 .

[3]  M. Tyler The phylogenetic significance of vocal sac structure in hylid frogs , 1971 .

[4]  W F Martin,et al.  Mechanics of sound production in toads of the genus Bufo: passive elements. , 1971, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[5]  C. Gans,et al.  Muscular control of the vocal tract during release signaling in the toad Bufo valliceps , 1972, Journal of morphology.

[6]  C. Gans Sound Production in the Salientia: Mechanism and Evolution of the Emitter , 1973 .

[7]  K. Wells The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  M. Ryan,et al.  Oxygen Consumption during Resting, Calling, and Nest Building in the Frog Physalaemus Pustulosus , 1982, Physiological Zoology.

[9]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Sound Communication in Anurans , 1983 .

[10]  M. Ryan Energetic efficiency of vocalization by the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1985 .

[11]  M. Ryan The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication , 1986 .

[12]  VOCALIZATION AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE JAMAICAN TREEFROG, HYLA MARIANAE (ANURA, HYLIDAE) , 1987 .

[13]  R. Dudley,et al.  Sound Production and Vocal Sac Inflation in the Tiingara Frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae) , 1991 .

[14]  M. Ryan,et al.  Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[15]  R. Dudley,et al.  Frogs in Helium: The Anuran Vocal Sac Is Not a Cavity Resonator , 1993, Physiological Zoology.

[16]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS , 1994 .

[17]  Alejandro P. Purgue The Sound Broadcasting System of the Bullfrog , 1995 .

[18]  R. Dudley,et al.  Elastic structures in the vocalization apparatus of the Túngara Frog Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae) , 1997, Journal of morphology.

[19]  M. Schlaepfer,et al.  Female Reciprocal Calling in a Costa Rican Leaf-Litter Frog, Eleutherodactylus podiciferus , 1998 .

[20]  A. S. Rand,et al.  Organization of Elastic Fibers in the Vocal Sac of Frogs , 2000 .

[21]  M. Ryan,et al.  Signal variation and call preferences for whine frequency in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[23]  M. Gridi-Papp Mechanism, behavior and evolution of calling in four North American treefrogs , 2003 .

[24]  P. Narins,et al.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Ryan,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION IN FEMALE PERCEPTUAL SPACE: HOW FEMALE TUNGARA FROGS PERCEIVE AND RESPOND TO COMPLEX POPULATION VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC MATING SIGNALS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  M. Ryan,et al.  The vocal sac as a visual cue in anuran communication: an experimental analysis using video playback , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Visual Signaling in Anuran Amphibians , 2004 .