An integrated methodology for assessing soil salinization, a pre-condition for land desertification

Abstract Soil salinization is mainly an arid-zone problem leading to land desertification. It reduces soil quality and limits the growing of crops. The control of this problem involves inventorying, mapping, and monitoring soil salinity, which requires cost-effective, rapid, and reliable methods for determining soil salinity in the field, and rapid, specific data-processing methods. This paper shows the usefulness of an integrated methodology involving a hand-held electromagnetic sensor (Geonics-EM38) and the ESAP (Electrical conductivity or salinity, Sampling, Assessment and Prediction) software for assessing, predicting, and mapping soil salinity. The salinity of a 0.45-ha surface-irrigated plot was analysed by reading the EM38 at 161 locations, and by employing the ESAP software for calibrating the sensor, and predicting and mapping soil salinity at multiple depths. To calibrate the EM38 sensor, the electrical conductivity of the saturation extract (ECe) of 57 soil samples taken at 19 points was measured. The multiple linear regression (MLR) calibration model predicted ECe from EM38 readings with R2 ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for the multiple-depth profile. Furthermore, the MLR calibration model provided field range average estimates of soil salinity. Fifty-seven percent of the field had ECe values above 4 dS m−1. The salinity levels and distribution in the root zone identified areas with inverted profiles, which revealed drainage problems. The integrated method presented is a breakthrough in the ability to accurately and rapidly assess soil salinity in agricultural lands.

[1]  D. Robinson,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity mapping as an agricultural management tool in arid zone soils , 2005 .

[2]  D. Corwin,et al.  Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture , 2003 .

[3]  Scott M. Lesch,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Soil Salinity Using Electromagnetic Induction Techniques: 1. Statistical Prediction Models: A Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Cokriging , 1995 .

[4]  R. Aragüés,et al.  Soil salinity and its distribution determined by soil sampling and electromagnetic techniques , 2003 .

[5]  D. López-Bruna,et al.  El comportamiento del sensor electromagnético y su calibración frente a la salinidad edáfica , 1996 .

[6]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Mapping Soil Salinity Using Calibrated Electromagnetic Measurements , 1992 .

[7]  J. D. Rhoades,et al.  Soil salinity assessment :methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements , 1999 .

[8]  David J. Strauss,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Soil Salinity Using Electromagnetic Induction Techniques: 2. An Efficient Spatial Sampling Algorithm Suitable for Multiple Linear Regression Model Identification and Estimation , 1995 .

[9]  L. A. Richards Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils , 1954 .

[10]  P. J. Diggle,et al.  Exploratory and Explanatory Statistical Analysis of Spatial Data , 1981 .

[11]  Andries S. Brandsma,et al.  Further evidence on alternative procedures for testing of spatial autocorrelation among regression disturbances , 1979 .

[12]  J. D. Rhoades,et al.  Monitoring for temporal changes in soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques , 1998 .

[13]  Juan Herrero,et al.  SALINITY ESTIMATES IN IRRIGATED SOILS USING ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION , 1992 .

[14]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Soil electrical conductivity: effects of soil properties and application to soil salinity appraisal. , 1990 .

[15]  F. Nachtergaele Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[16]  R. Mckenzie,et al.  CONVERSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTANCE READINGS TO SATURATED PASTE EXTRACT VALUES IN SOILS FOR DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE, TEXTURE, AND MOISTURE CONDITIONS , 1989 .