Mind the gap between ICES nations’ future seafood consumption and aquaculture production

As the human population grows and climate change threatens the stability of seafood sources, we face the key question of how we will meet increasing demand, and do so sustainably. Many of the 20 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) member nations have been global leaders in the protection and management of wild fisheries, but to date, most of these nations have not developed robust aquaculture industries. Using existing data and documentation of aquaculture targets from government and industry, we compiled and analysed past trends in farmed and wild seafood production and consumption in ICES nations, as well as the potential and need to increase aquaculture production by 2050. We found that the majority of ICES nations lacks long-term strategies for aquaculture growth, with an increasing gap between future domestic production and consumption—resulting in a potential 7 million tonne domestic seafood deficit by 2050, which would be supplemented by imports from other countries (e.g. China). We also found recognition of climate change as a concern for aquaculture growth, but little on what that means for meeting production goals. Our findings highlight the need to prioritize aquaculture policy to set more ambitious domestic production goals and/or improve sustainable sourcing of seafood from other parts of the world, with explicit recognition and strategic planning for climate change affecting such decisions. In short, there is a need for greater concerted effort by ICES member nations to address aquaculture’s long-term future prospects.

[1]  James E. Salzman,et al.  Governance challenges for tropical nations losing fish species due to climate change , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[2]  Cody S. Szuwalski,et al.  Marine seafood production via intense exploitation and cultivation in China: Costs, benefits, and risks , 2020, PloS one.

[3]  Christopher M. Anderson,et al.  Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  E. Ytteborg,et al.  The importance of calibrating climate change projections to local conditions at aquaculture sites , 2020 .

[5]  Rebecca L. Selden,et al.  Climate-Driven Shifts in Marine Species Ranges: Scaling from Organisms to Communities. , 2020, Annual review of marine science.

[6]  Martin D. Smith,et al.  A Global Blue Revolution: Aquaculture Growth Across Regions, Species, and Countries , 2020, Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture.

[7]  M. Meuwissen,et al.  Inclusive environmental performance through ‘beyond-farm’ aquaculture governance , 2019 .

[8]  D. Knowler,et al.  Climate change and aquaculture: considering adaptation potential , 2019, Aquaculture Environment Interactions.

[9]  C. Mora,et al.  Escaping the perfect storm of simultaneous climate change impacts on agriculture and marine fisheries , 2019, Science Advances.

[10]  Jessica A. Gephart,et al.  Opinion: Putting all foods on the same table: Achieving sustainable food systems requires full accounting , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Harold P. Batchelder,et al.  Recent advances in understanding the effects of climate change on the world’s oceans , 2019, ICES Journal of Marine Science.

[12]  Gloria M. Luque,et al.  The characterization of seafood mislabeling: A global meta-analysis , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[13]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Governance of marine aquaculture: Pitfalls, potential, and pathways forward , 2019, Marine Policy.

[14]  Jessica A. Gephart,et al.  Opinion: To create sustainable seafood industries, the United States needs a better accounting of imports and exports , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Jahn Petter Johnsen,et al.  Limitations to growth: Social-ecological challenges to aquaculture development in five wealthy nations , 2019, Marine Policy.

[16]  James T Thorson,et al.  Impacts of historical warming on marine fisheries production , 2019, Science.

[17]  W. Cheung,et al.  Benefits of the Paris Agreement to ocean life, economies, and people , 2019, Science Advances.

[18]  Shirley Thompson,et al.  Global Aquaculture Productivity, Environmental Sustainability, and Climate Change Adaptability , 2018, Environmental Management.

[19]  B. Halpern,et al.  Global change in marine aquaculture production potential under climate change , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[20]  J. Drydyk Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics , 2018 .

[21]  R. Watson,et al.  Mapping nearly a century and a half of global marine fishing: 1869–2015 , 2018, Marine Policy.

[22]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The potential for blue growth in marine fish yield, profit and abundance of fish in the ocean , 2018 .

[23]  James R. Watson,et al.  The mechanics of blue growth: Management of oceanic natural resource use with multiple, interacting sectors , 2018 .

[24]  M. Siple,et al.  Financial and Ecological Implications of Global Seafood Mislabeling , 2017 .

[25]  Nathan M. Bacheler,et al.  Climate Change Impacts on Fisheries and Aquaculture of the United States , 2017 .

[26]  L. Ross,et al.  Vulnerability of aquaculture-related livelihoods to changing climate at the global scale , 2017 .

[27]  C. Funk,et al.  Do markets and trade help or hurt the global food system adapt to climate change , 2017 .

[28]  Brett R. Scheffers,et al.  Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being , 2017, Science.

[29]  D. Bass,et al.  New Paradigms to Help Solve the Global Aquaculture Disease Crisis , 2017, PLoS pathogens.

[30]  B. Halpern,et al.  Public Perceptions of Aquaculture: Evaluating Spatiotemporal Patterns of Sentiment around the World , 2017, PloS one.

[31]  David R. Easterling,et al.  Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II , 2017 .

[32]  U. R. Sumaila,et al.  Fishing for the future: An overview of challenges and opportunities , 2016 .

[33]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Borg,et al.  Aquaculture’s struggle for space: the need for coastal spatial planning and the potential benefits of Allocated Zones for Aquaculture (AZAs) to avoid conflict and promote sustainability , 2016 .

[35]  Michael L. Pace,et al.  Structure and evolution of the global seafood trade network , 2015 .

[36]  B. Worm,et al.  Changing recruitment capacity in global fish stocks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  R. Naylor,et al.  China's aquaculture and the world's wild fisheries , 2015, Science.

[38]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Reflections on the success of traditional fisheries management , 2014 .

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  C. Engle,et al.  COMPETITIVENESS OF U.S. AQUACULTURE WITHIN THE CURRENT U.S. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK , 2013 .

[41]  M. Verdegem,et al.  Responsible Aquaculture in 2050: Valuing Local Conditions and Human Innovations will be Key to Success , 2013 .

[42]  N. Hishamunda Policy and governance in aquaculture Lessons learned and way forward , 2013 .

[43]  S. S. Silva,et al.  Aquaculture: a newly emergent food production sector—and perspectives of its impacts on biodiversity and conservation , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[44]  William E. Rees,et al.  Interregional sustainability: governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world , 2011 .

[45]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Rebuilding Global Fisheries , 2009, Science.

[46]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[47]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[48]  A. Went The History of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea , 1972 .