A generalised fuzzy TOPSIS with improved closeness coefficient

Abstract In this paper, we propose a Generalised-Fuzzy-TOPSIS method as a versatile evaluation model. The model is suitable for different types of fuzzy or interval-valued numbers, with or without subjective weights of criteria being defined by evaluators. Additionally, we extend the final ranking step of the TOPSIS method, which is the calculation of closeness coefficient based on the separation from Negative Ideal Solution (NIS) and proximity to Positive Ideal Solution (PIS). Experiments show that with the same focus on PIS and NIS distances, our proposed ranking is identical to TOPSIS, and also performs very well when varying the distance weights. The applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated with relevant examples of technology and material selection in the context of additive manufacturing. Sensitivity analyses, based on subjective weights of criteria, degree of optimism, evaluators’ weights in group decision making, and distance weights, are presented to assist managers in making more informed decisions.

[1]  Terry Wohlers Wohlers report 2016 , 2016 .

[2]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Ian N. Durbach,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[7]  Ting Kuo,et al.  A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  F. Piller,et al.  Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030 , 2017 .

[9]  Dariusz Walczak,et al.  Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2019, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[12]  Jun Ye,et al.  Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Fei Ye,et al.  An extended TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for virtual enterprise partner selection , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[16]  Soh-Khim Ong,et al.  Designing automotive products for remanufacturing from material selection perspective , 2017 .

[17]  Rachel Ehrenberg The 3‐D printing revolution: Dreams made real, one layer at a time , 2013 .

[18]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  MardaniAbbas,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 , 2015 .

[20]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Haris Ch. Doukas,et al.  Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch,et al.  A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[24]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .