Management of Acute Otitis Media by Primary Care Physicians: Trends Since the Release of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Family Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

OBJECTIVES. In 2004, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians released a clinical practice guideline on the management of acute otitis media that included endorsement of an observation option for selected cases and recommendations of specific antibiotics. We sought to describe primary care physicians' current management of acute otitis media to compare it with the guideline's recommendations and describe trends since 2004. DESIGN. We used a mail survey from March through June 2006 within the Slone Center Office-Based Research Network, a national practice-based pediatric research network. RESULTS. The response rate was 299 (62.7%) of 477. The observation option was considered reasonable by 83.3%, compared with 88.0% in 2004, and was used in a median of 15% of acute otitis media cases over the previous 3 months. The most common physician-identified barriers to the use of the observation option were parental reluctance (83.5%) and the cost and difficulty of follow-up of children who do not improve (30.9%). In terms of antibiotic choices for acute otitis media, agreement with the guideline's antibiotic recommendation for 4 common clinical scenarios was as follows: high-dose amoxicillin for acute otitis media with nonsevere symptoms (57.2%), high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for acute otitis media with severe symptoms (12.7%), high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for cases that failed to respond to amoxicillin (42.8%), and intramuscular ceftriaxone for cases that failed to respond to treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate (16.7%). Each of these proportions declined from 2004. CONCLUSIONS. Most primary care physicians accept the concept of an observation option for acute otitis media but use it only occasionally. Antibiotics prescribed for acute otitis media differ markedly from the guideline's recommendations, and the difference has increased since 2004.

[1]  A. Racine,et al.  Drowning in a Sea of Advice: Pediatricians and American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statements , 2006, Pediatrics.

[2]  Donald H. Arnold,et al.  Wait-and-see prescription for the treatment of acute otitis media: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[3]  J. Schmier,et al.  Efficacy, tolerability, and parent reported outcomes for cefdinir vs. high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspension for acute otitis media in young children* , 2006, Current medical research and opinion.

[4]  R. Propp,et al.  Watchful Waiting for Acute Otitis Media: Are Parents and Physicians Ready? , 2006, Pediatrics.

[5]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Knowledge and Practices Relating to the 2004 Acute Otitis Media Clinical Practice Guideline: A Survey of Practicing Physicians , 2006, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[6]  Marie Diener-West,et al.  An Assessment of the Shared-Decision Model in Parents of Children With Acute Otitis Media , 2005, Pediatrics.

[7]  L. Ronfani,et al.  Delayed prescription may reduce the use of antibiotics for acute otitis media: a prospective observational study in primary care. , 2005, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[8]  D. Mccormick,et al.  Nonsevere Acute Otitis Media: A Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes of Watchful Waiting Versus Immediate Antibiotic Treatment , 2005, Pediatrics.

[9]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Reaction toward a new treatment paradigm for acute otitis media. , 2005, Pediatric emergency care.

[10]  J. Hedrick,et al.  Community-Wide Vaccination with the Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Significantly Alters the Microbiology of Acute Otitis Media , 2004, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[11]  M. Pichichero,et al.  Changes in Frequency and Pathogens Causing Acute Otitis Media in 1995–2003 , 2004, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[12]  P. Mäkelä,et al.  Association of clinical signs and symptoms with bacterial findings in acute otitis media. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[13]  A. Go,et al.  Reduction in antibiotic use among US children, 1996-2000. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[14]  Robert M Siegel,et al.  Treatment of otitis media with observation and a safety-net antibiotic prescription. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[15]  J. Hughes,et al.  Trends in antimicrobial prescribing rates for children and adolescents. , 2002, JAMA.

[16]  P. Little,et al.  Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of two prescribing strategies for childhood acute otitis media , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  H. Bauchner,et al.  Pediatricians' Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices Regarding Clinical Practice Guidelines: A National Survey , 2000, Pediatrics.

[18]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[19]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Streptococcus pneumoniae causes otitis media with higher fever and more redness of tympanic membranes than Haemophilus influenzae or Moraxella catarrhalis. , 1999, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[20]  J. Froom,et al.  Routine antimicrobial treatment of acute otitis media: is it necessary? , 1997, JAMA.

[21]  J. Paradise Managing otitis media: a time for change. , 1995, Pediatrics.