An exploration on the machine learning approaches to determine the erosion rates for liquid hydrocarbon transmission pipelines towards safer and cleaner transportations

Abstract Erosion is commonly found in pipelines with existence of interactions between solid particles, fluid product transported and the surrounding materials. Erosion may lead to material degradation in pipeline and may eventually cause pipeline failure. This failure may cause catastrophic consequence to the surrounding health, property and the environment. Therefore, a better estimation on the pipeline erosion rate is critical for the pipeline engineers to maintain a safer, more cost-effective and sustainable operating condition. In this study, two erosion rate models were used to create an erosion rate database and three machine-learning approaches were developed to help pipeline engineers evaluate the optimal flow velocity. The major results of this study are threefold. First, a purely visual approach was used to present critical information to decision makers. Second, three machine learning approaches (classification tree, artificial neural network and Bayesian network) were established for the erosion rate determination. Third, the benefits and limits of each approach were discussed and evaluated. As novel methodologies to estimate pipeline erosion rate, the machine learning approaches can serve as simple or comprehensive tools to address the various pipeline operating scenarios, with certain or uncertain information. This study provides innovative, intuitive and cost-effective tools for the pipeline operators to predict the erosion rate under various operating conditions and handles the uncertainty via a probabilistic approach, aiming to build safer and more environmental-friendly pipelines.

[1]  G. Reniers,et al.  Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation: A systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS , 2021 .

[2]  Yin Cheng,et al.  Probabilistic permanent fault displacement hazard via Monte Carlo simulation and its consideration for the probabilistic risk assessment of buried continuous steel pipelines , 2017 .

[3]  S. Shirazi,et al.  Electrical resistance probe measurements of solid particle erosion in multiphase annular flow , 2017 .

[4]  Xinming Hu,et al.  CO2 erosion–corrosion of pipeline steel (API X65) in oil and gas conditions—A systematic approach , 2009 .

[5]  Siamak Haji Yakhchali,et al.  Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment , 2013 .

[6]  Selen Cremaschi,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in erosion predictions using data mining methods , 2018, Wear.

[7]  Liying Sun,et al.  A method for fast simulating the liquid seepage-diffusion process coupled with internal flow after leaking from buried pipelines , 2019 .

[8]  S. Nešić,et al.  Review of the API RP 14E erosional velocity equation: Origin, applications, misuses, limitations and alternatives , 2019, Wear.

[9]  Uwe Hampel,et al.  Assessment of a hybrid CFD model for simulation of complex vertical upward gas–liquid churn flow , 2016 .

[10]  Glenn B DeWolf Process safety management in the pipeline industry: parallels and differences between the pipeline integrity management (IMP) rule of the Office of Pipeline Safety and the PSM/RMP approach for process facilities. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  Zhi Zong,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Prediction of Submarine Pipelines Subjected to Underwater Explosion Shock , 1999 .

[12]  Chonghun Han,et al.  Risk-based underground pipeline safety management considering corrosion effect. , 2018, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  I A Basheer,et al.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[14]  E. Heitz Mechanistically based prevention strategies of flow-induced corrosion , 1996 .

[15]  S. Shirazi,et al.  Predicting fine particle erosion utilizing computational fluid dynamics , 2017 .

[16]  Siamack A. Shirazi,et al.  A comprehensive review of solid particle erosion modeling for oil and gas wells and pipelines applications , 2014 .

[17]  Haixiao Liu,et al.  An integrated model of predicting sand erosion in elbows for multiphase flows , 2020 .

[18]  N. R. Kesana,et al.  CFD simulation of sand particle erosion under multiphase flow conditions , 2017 .

[19]  Wei Dai,et al.  A bi-objective optimization approach to reducing uncertainty in pipeline erosion predictions , 2019, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[20]  A. Neville,et al.  Case study on erosion–corrosion degradation of pipework located on an offshore oil and gas facility , 2011 .

[21]  Zahiraniza Mustaffa,et al.  Evaluating the Characteristics of Marine Pipelines Inspection Data Using Probabilistic Approach , 2009 .

[22]  Narasi Sridhar,et al.  Quantitive Assessment of Corrosion Probability—A Bayesian Network Approach , 2014 .

[23]  Mamdouh M. Salama,et al.  An Alternative to API 14E Erosional Velocity Limits for Sand-Laden Fluids , 2000 .

[24]  Francois Ayello,et al.  Corrosion threat assessment of crude oil flow lines using Bayesian network model , 2015 .