Judgments of approach speed for motorcycles across different lighting levels and the effect of an improved tri-headlight configuration.

The misperception of vehicle approach speed is a key contributory factor to road traffic crash involvement. Past research has indicated that individuals use the rate of visual looming to calculate the time to passage (TTP) of a vehicle, and that smaller vehicles loom to a lesser extent than larger vehicles. Despite a disproportionate number of fatal injuries occurring on the road after dark, and a higher than average number of accidents involving automobile drivers violating the right of way of a motorcyclist occurring in low light conditions, there has been very little consideration of the accuracy of TTP for smaller and larger vehicles under low levels of luminance. We investigated drivers' judgments of motorcycle and car approach speeds across a number of levels of luminance within a virtual city scene, as well as the effectiveness of a tri-headlight formation on motorcycle speed judgments. The accuracy of car approach speed judgments were not affected by changes in lighting conditions, but speed judgments for the solo headlight motorcycle became significantly less accurate as lighting reduced in the early night and night-time conditions. Incorporation of a tri-headlight formation onto the standard motorcycle frame resulted in improved accuracy of approach speed judgments, relative to the solo headlight motorcycle, as ambient light levels reduced. The practical implications of the findings are discussed in terms of road safety and motorcycle design.

[1]  Graham J Hole,et al.  Some factors affecting motorcyclists' conspicuity , 1996 .

[2]  M Gould,et al.  Errors in judging the approach rate of motorcycles in nighttime conditions and the effect of an improved lighting configuration. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Current Biology , 2012, Current Biology.

[4]  John P. Wann,et al.  Reduced Sensitivity to Visual Looming Inflates the Risk Posed by Speeding Vehicles When Children Try to Cross the Road , 2011, Psychological science.

[5]  YI-NAN LIa,et al.  Accident Analysis and Prevention , 2009 .

[6]  Scott A. Beardsley,et al.  A Laterally Interconnected Neural Architecture in MST Accounts for Psychophysical Discrimination of Complex Motion Patterns , 2001, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[7]  John P. Wann,et al.  Perceiving Time to Collision Activates the Sensorimotor Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[8]  Candida Castro,et al.  Vehicle distance estimations in nighttime driving: a real-setting study☆ , 2005 .

[9]  Chih-Wei Pai,et al.  A mixed logit analysis of motorists' right-of-way violation in motorcycle accidents at priority T-junctions. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Patricia DeLucia,et al.  Information Integration in Judgements of Time to Contact , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  I G Pallikaris,et al.  Road traffic casualties: understanding the night-time death toll , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[12]  Errol R. Hoffmann,et al.  Motorcycle conspicuity and traffic accidents , 1979 .

[13]  M. Flannagan,et al.  The role of ambient light level in fatal crashes: inferences from daylight saving time transitions. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Thierry Brenac,et al.  Motorcyclist conspicuity-related accidents in urban areas: A speed problem? , 2006 .

[15]  Graham Clews Night vision. , 2004, The Health service journal.

[16]  Massachusetts. Parole Board. Annual Statistical Report (2008) , 2007 .

[17]  Mark S Horswill,et al.  Motorcycle Accident Risk Could Be Inflated by a Time to Arrival Illusion , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  J F Kraus,et al.  Injuries sustained by motorcycle riders in the approaching turn crash configuration. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  David R. Thom,et al.  MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CAUSE FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTERMEASURES. VOLUME II: APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA , 1980 .

[20]  Michael J. Flannagan,et al.  RISK OF FATAL REAR-END COLLISIONS: IS THERE MORE TO IT THAN ATTENTION? , 2005 .

[21]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[23]  K R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Seeing movement in the dark , 1999, Nature.

[24]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[25]  D. J. Bradley Night Vision: Basic, Clinical and Applied Aspects , 1991 .

[26]  P. Hancock,et al.  The Perception of Arrival Time for Different Oncoming Vehicles at an Intersection , 1994 .

[27]  Chih-Wei Pai,et al.  Motorcycle right-of-way accidents--a literature review. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  R. Hess,et al.  Night vision : basic, clinical, and applied aspects , 1990 .

[29]  J. Sivak Optometry and vision science. , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  東京証券取引所,et al.  東証統計年報 = The annual statistical report , 1984 .