Algorithms for estimating missing elements of incomplete intuitionistic preference relations

Preference relations as simple and efficient information description tools have been widely used in practical decision‐making problems. Intuitionistic preference relation, which is often met in real problems, is usually utilized to provide the experts' vague or fuzzy opinions over objects under uncertain circumstances. Owing to the limitations of the experts' professional knowledge and experience, the provided preferences in an intuitionistic preference relation are usually incomplete. Consequently, how to estimate the missing information in an expert's incomplete intuitionistic preference relation becomes a necessary step in a decision‐making process. In this paper, we define the concept of multiplicative consistent intuitionistic preference relation and develop two estimation algorithms. The first algorithm is used to estimate the missing elements using only the known preference values in an acceptable incomplete intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation with the least judgments. The second one is given for the estimation of missing elements of the acceptable incomplete intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with more known judgments. The advantages of the developed algorithms over the existing one are detailedly analyzed, and some examples are provided to illustrate the solution processes of the algorithms and to verify their practicality and superiority. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[4]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Distances Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Straightforward Approaches may not work , 2006, 2006 3rd International IEEE Conference Intelligent Systems.

[5]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Model Integrating Different Preference Structures , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[6]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Some Problems with Entropy Measures for the Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2007, WILF.

[7]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[8]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[9]  Eulalia Szmidt,et al.  Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Classification of Imbalanced and Overlapping Classes , 2008, Intelligent Techniques and Tools for Novel System Architectures.

[10]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Incomplete interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2009, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[11]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Note on “Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations” , 2008 .

[12]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An integrated model-based interactive approach to FMAGDM with incomplete preference information , 2010, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[13]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Tugba Efendigil,et al.  A combined fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting shopping center site: An example from Istanbul, Turkey , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  Automorphisms, negations and implication operators , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  On Compatibility of Interval Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2004, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group , 2009, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[19]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making , 2002 .

[20]  Zeshui Xu A Method for Estimating Criteria Weights from Intuitionistic Preference Relations , 2007, ICFIE.

[21]  Z. Xu Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Information , 2007 .

[22]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  A New Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Straightforward Approaches may not work , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[23]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[24]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives in a multi-criteria decision making problem , 2009, NAFIPS 2009 - 2009 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society.

[25]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[26]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  A Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Application in Supporting Medical Diagnostic Reasoning , 2004, ICAISC.

[27]  R. Yager Families of OWA operators , 1993 .

[28]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  On averaging operators for Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[29]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Non-conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making , 1989 .

[30]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[31]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2006, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[32]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Computational Intelligence for Knowledge-Based Systems Design , 2010 .

[33]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Correlation of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2010, IPMU.

[34]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions: Representation, Aggregation and Models , 2008 .

[35]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  Generation of interval‐valued fuzzy and atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy connectives from fuzzy connectives and from Kα operators: Laws for conjunctions and disjunctions, amplitude , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[37]  Zeshui Xu Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making , 2005 .

[38]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[39]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Aggregation Operators in Interval-valued Fuzzy and Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Theory , 2008, Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions: Representation, Aggregation and Models.

[40]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  A consensus‐reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[41]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[43]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A survey of preference relations , 2007, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[44]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[46]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[47]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Nonlinear optimization models for multiple attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information , 2010 .

[48]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[49]  X. Zeshui,et al.  A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Eulalia Szmidt,et al.  Amount of Information and Its Reliability in the Ranking of Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Alternatives , 2009 .

[51]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Optimal aggregation of fuzzy preference relations with an application to broadband internet service selection , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  Jian Ma,et al.  An optimization approach to multiperson decision making based on different formats of preference information , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[53]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[54]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[55]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators , 1997 .

[56]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[57]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[58]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications , 1997 .

[59]  F. Lootsma Saaty's priority theory and the nomination of a senior professor in operations Research , 1980 .

[60]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[61]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[62]  S. Orlovsky Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation , 1978 .