Determining appropriate models for joint control using surface electrical stimulation of soleus in spinal cord injury

The mechanical impedance of the ankle joint during electrical stimulation of the soleus is studied by applying constant-velocity 10° angular perturbations to the ankle and measuring the resultant torque. Both neurologically intact subjects and spinal cord injured subjects are tested. Lumped, piecewise linear models are developed to predict the torque from the measured displacement and acceleration signals. The commonly used second-order mass-spring-dashpot model fails to predict the changes in torque that occur following imposed movements. A fiveelement, directionally-dependent piecewise linear model is much better at predicting the measured responses for velocities up to 50° s−1. Numerical least squared error indentification techniques are used to estimate the model parameters for three neurologically intact and three spinal cord injured subjects. The average error between the model’s response and the measured response across all subjects is 10·9%. There is some evidence that a velocity-dependent non-linear model could produce better results than the directionally-dependent piecewise linear model.

[1]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[2]  U. Mishra,et al.  The effect of interface and alloy quality on the DC and RF performance of Ga/sub 0.47/In/sub 0.53/As-Al/sub 0.48/In/sub 0.52/As HEMTs , 1989 .

[3]  H. Frahm,et al.  Comparative volumetric studies on pallidum in insectivores and primates. Evolutionary aspects. , 1979, Applied neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Crago,et al.  Nonlinear joint angle control for artificially stimulated muscle , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  A. Bahler,et al.  Modeling of mammalian skeletal muscle. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[6]  R J Jaeger Design and simulation of closed-loop electrical stimulation orthoses for restoration of quiet standing in paraplegia. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Muscle stiffness in human ankle dorsiflexors: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  I W Hunter,et al.  Human ankle joint stiffness over the full range of muscle activation levels. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  B. Katz The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction , 1939, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Liberson Wt,et al.  Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. , 1961, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  J. Reswick,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation : applications in neural prostheses , 1977 .

[12]  R. Ramsey,et al.  The isometric length‐tension diagram of isolated skeletal muscle fibers of the frog , 1940 .

[13]  R. Stein,et al.  Frequency response of human soleus muscle. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  C A Phillips Electrical muscle stimulation in combination with a reciprocating gait orthosis for ambulation by paraplegics. , 1989, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[15]  Michel A. Lemay,et al.  External Control of Limb Movements Involving Environmental Interactions , 1990 .

[16]  G. Agarwal,et al.  Compliance of the Human Ankle Joint , 1977 .

[17]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  Response to sudden torques about ankle in man. II. Postmyotatic reactions. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Gideon F. Inbar,et al.  FNS Control Schemes for the Upper Limb , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  S. H. Voldman,et al.  The effects of gate field on the leakage characteristics of heavily doped junctions , 1989 .

[20]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Protection Against Link Errors and Failures Using Network Coding , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[21]  Daniel Graupe,et al.  Time series analysis: Identification and adaptive filtering , 1984 .

[22]  G. Yarkony,et al.  Standing the spinal cord injured patient by electrical stimulation: refinement of a protocol for clinical use , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Response to sudden torques about ankle in man: myotatic reflex. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Dynamic relationship between isometric muscle tension and the electromyogram in man. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  M. Solomonow,et al.  The dynamic response model of nine different skeletal muscles , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Dependence of human ankle compliance on joint angle. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  L. Vodovnik,et al.  Control of a skeletal joint by electrical stimulation of antagonists , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[28]  G. L. Gottlieb,et al.  Biomechanical and reflex responses to joint perturbations during electrical stimulation of muscle: instrumentation and measurement techniques , 1994, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[29]  R. Penn,et al.  Lower Extremity Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation in Cases of Spinal Cord Injury , 1984, Neurosurgery.

[30]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Frequency response model of skeletal muscle: effect of perturbation level, and control strategy , 1989, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[31]  A. Levin,et al.  The Viscous Elastic Properties of Muscle , 1927 .

[32]  Michael R. Neuman,et al.  Sensors for Use with Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  P. Rack,et al.  The ankle stretch reflexes in normal and spastic subjects. The response to sinusoidal movement. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  P. L. Weiss,et al.  Position dependence of ankle joint dynamics--I. Passive mechanics. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Gottlieb Gl,et al.  Mathematical modeling and simulation of the postural control loop. Part III. , 1984 .