Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation

A theoretical model of nonscience majors' motivation to learn science was tested by surveying 369 students in a large-enrollment college science course that satisfies a core curriculum requirement. Based on a social-cognitive framework, motivation to learn science was conceptualized as having both cognitive and affective influences that foster science achievement. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the hypothesized relationships among the variables. The students' motivation, as measured by the Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ), had a strong direct influence on their achievement, as measured by their science grade point average. The students' motivation was influenced by their belief in the relevance of science to their careers. This belief was slightly stronger in women than men. Essays by the students and interviews with them provided insight into their motivation. The model suggests that instructors should strategically connect science concepts to the careers of nonscience majors through such means as case studies to increase motivation and achievement. 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 44: 1088-1107, 2007 Keywords: biology; attitudes; cognitive science; achievement

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[2]  Kimberly A. S. Howard,et al.  Career Development in the Schools , 2002 .

[3]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Wendell H. Potter,et al.  Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors , 2004 .

[5]  J. Howard Johnston,et al.  About Motivating Students , 1982 .

[6]  J. Cassady.  Self-Reported GPA and SAT: A Methodological Note , 2001 .

[7]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Gender and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning , 2002 .

[8]  R. Coll,et al.  Development of Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ). , 2003 .

[9]  D. Schunk.  Social Cognitive Theory and Self-Regulated Learning , 1989 .

[10]  Elaine Seymour,et al.  "The Problem Iceberg" in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education: Student Explanations for High Attrition Rates. , 1992 .

[11]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[12]  Brian P. Coppola,et al.  Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry , 2003 .

[13]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  The development of academic self-efficacy. , 2002 .

[14]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[15]  R. Coll,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHEMISTRY ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES QUESTIONNAIRE (CAEQ) , 2002 .

[16]  Angela B. Ginorio.  Warming the Climate for Women in Academic Science. , 1995 .

[17]  E. Henttonen,et al.  Women in Science. Career processes and Outcomes , 2004 .

[18]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Gender and Orientations Toward the Future: Links to Motivation , 2004 .

[19]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[20]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[21]  Colin Sharp.  Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[22]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Science and Health , 1991 .

[24]  A. Collins.  National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[25]  D. Silverman.  Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[26]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  Nestedness of Beliefs: Examining a Prospective Elementary Teacher's Belief System about Science Teaching and Learning. , 2003 .

[27]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[28]  D. Maloney,et al.  Teaching Science To the Nonmajor--An Interdisciplinary Approach. , 1998 .

[29]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform , 2000 .

[30]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[31]  A. Ferligoj,et al.  Career plans and gender-role attitudes of college students in the United States, Japan, and Slovenia , 1993 .

[32]  M. Eddy.  Science and Health , 1875 .

[33]  Laura Arwood,et al.  Teaching cell biology to nonscience majors through forensics, or how to design a killer course. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[34]  Jerrell C. Cassady,et al.  Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance , 2002 .

[35]  John M. Reveles,et al.  Science literacy and academic identity formulation , 2004 .

[36]  Daniels,et al.  Biology: A Guide to the Natural World , 1999 .

[37]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[38]  What Really Matters in College: How Students View and Value Liberal Education. Liberal Education & America's Promise. , 2005 .

[39]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[40]  Darrell Anthony Luzzo.  Gender Differences in College Students' Career Maturity and Perceived Barriers in Career Development , 1995 .

[41]  J. Reeve,et al.  Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. , 2003 .

[42]  Wendy Patton,et al.  Developmental issues in career maturity and career decision status , 2001 .

[43]  F. Burton.  Zoo Praxis and Theories: Teaching the Well-Being of Nonhuman Primates. , 2004 .

[44]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[45]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[46]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[47]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[48]  Cesar O. Malave,et al.  Cross‐time attitudes, concept formation, and achievement in college freshman physics , 2000 .

[49]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[50]  P. Pintrich.  Student learning and college teaching , 1988 .

[51]  Penny L. Hammrich,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Educational and Career Trajectories of Female Participants of an Urban Informal Science Education Program , 2004 .

[52]  Albert Bandura,et al.  The Primacy of Self-Regulation in Health Promotion , 2005 .

[53]  Linus Pauling.  The Significance of Chemistry to Man in the Modern World , 1951 .

[54]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[55]  Eleanor Dantzler Siebert,et al.  College Pathways to the Science Education Standards , 2001 .

[56]  Gender Differences in Reactions to College Course Requirements or "Why Females Are Better Students" , 2005 .

[57]  H. Walberg.  Improving School Science in Advanced and Developing Countries , 1991 .

[58]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1974 .

[59]  Clyde Freeman Herreid,et al.  The Interrupted Case Method , 2005 .