This paper looks at the problem a novice qualitative researcher faces when entering a classroom – what should the observer pay attention to? With observational notes from the author's research to illustrate the case, the paper argues that a researcher need not choose from among the many methods discussed in the literature for dealing with this problem. The alternative offered is that the environemt itself is the best guide for the researcher. An observer who is subjective without being self‐focused will find that the environment, people, and events begin to register in significant and often unexpected ways. The observer is changed by the act of observing – a phenomenon illustrated by the author's characterization of researcher as videocamera, playgoer, evaluator, subjective inquirer, insider, and reflective interpreter. Through the course of these changing perspectives, the environment is also changed, becoming more interesting and compelling, and guiding the researcher's attention more clearly. The paper...
[1]
C. Mills.
The Sociological Imagination
,
1959
.
[2]
S. Ball,et al.
Self‐doubt and soft data: social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork
,
1990
.
[3]
M. Miles,et al.
Some procedures for causal analysis of multiple‐case data
,
1989
.
[4]
Matthew B. Miles,et al.
New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: vignettes and pre‐structured cases
,
1990
.
[5]
J. Piaget.
The Moral Judgment of the Child
,
1932
.
[6]
Rom Harré,et al.
The Rules of Disorder
,
1978
.
[7]
C. Geertz.
Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology
,
1983
.
[8]
R. Linn,et al.
Qualitative methods in research on teaching
,
1985
.
[9]
John Dewey,et al.
Theory of the Moral Life
,
1960
.
[10]
W. Corsaro,et al.
Friendship and peer culture in the early years
,
1985
.