Investigation of Causal Relationship Between Touch Sensations of Robots and Personality Impressions by Path Analysis

Physical human–robot interaction plays an important role in social robotics, and touch is one of the key factors that influence a human’s impression of robots. However, very few studies have explored different conditions pertaining to such interactions, and therefore, only few systematic results have been reported. As the first step toward addressing this issue, we studied the types of impressions of a robot’s personality that humans may experience when they touch a soft part of the robot. In the study, the left forearm of a child-like android robot named “Affetto” was exposed; the original forearm was made of silicone rubber and can be replaced with any one of three other forearms that provide different sensations of hardness upon touching. Participants were asked to touch the robot’s forearm and answer evaluation questionnaires on 19 touch sensations and 46 personality impressions for each of the four conditions associated with the different forearms. Four impression factors for touch sensations and three for personality impressions were extracted from the evaluation scores by the factor analysis method. The causal relationships between these factors were analyzed by the path analysis method. Several significant causal relationships were found, for example, between preferable touch sensations and likable personality impressions. The study results are expected to help in the design of the personality impressions of robots by facilitating a more systematic design of touch sensations. Furthermore, the results of an analysis of variance suggested that the most preferable touch sensation is possibly related to the robot’s appearance and that designers of social robots should understand the complex touch sensation properties of humans.

[1]  Takashi Maeno,et al.  Development of Artificial Skin Having Human Skin-like Texture (Realization and Evaluation of Human Skin-like Texture by Emulating Surface Shape Pattern and Elastic Structure) , 2007 .

[2]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Importance of Touch for Conveying Affection in a Multimodal Interaction with a Small Humanoid Robot , 2015, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[3]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[4]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Semi-Autonomous Robot Avatar as a Medium for Family Communication and Education , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[5]  T. Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy: A New Approach for Mental Healthcare of the Elderly – A Mini-Review , 2010, Gerontology.

[6]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Design of 22-DOF pneumatically actuated upper body for child android ‘Affetto’ , 2015, Adv. Robotics.

[7]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Path Analysis for the Halo Effect of Touch Sensations of Robots on Their Personality Impressions , 2016, ICSR.

[8]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .

[9]  C. Osgood The nature and measurement of meaning. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  The Role of Affective Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Intent and Expectations in Touching the Haptic Creature , 2012, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents , 2009 .

[12]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Gaze behaviour, believability, likability and the iCat , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[13]  Yoshikazu Mori,et al.  Evaluation of Impression for Hug Dolls , 2012 .

[14]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Keepon : A Playful Robot for Research, Therapy, and Entertainment (Original Paper) , 2009 .

[15]  Aude Billard,et al.  A survey of Tactile Human-Robot Interactions , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[16]  加納 政芳,et al.  なにもできないロボット Babyloid の開発 , 2011 .

[17]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Is The Uncanny Valley An Uncanny Cliff? , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[18]  Masaaki Inoue,et al.  THE RESEARCH DOMAIN AND SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF ADJECTIVE-PAIRS IN A SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD IN JAPAN , 1985 .

[19]  Minoru Asada,et al.  CB2: A child robot with biomimetic body for cognitive developmental robotics , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[20]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, IEEE Trans. Robotics.

[21]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms , 2003, Speech Commun..

[22]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots' animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  The effects of robot touch and proactive behaviour on perceptions of human-robot interactions , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).