Developmental learning for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

We present an approach to Intelligent Tutoring Systems which adaptively personalizes sequences of learning activities to maximize skills acquired by students, taking into account the limited time and motivational resources. At a given point in time, the system tries to propose to the student the activity which makes him progress best. We introduce two algorithms that rely on the empirical estimation of the learning progress, one that uses information about the difficulty of each exercise RiARiT and another that does not use any knowledge about the problem ZPDES. The system is based on the combination of three approaches. First, it leverages recent models of intrinsically motivated learning by transposing them to active teaching, relying on empirical estimation of learning progress provided by specific activities to particular students. Second, it uses state-of-the-art Multi-Arm Bandit (MAB) techniques to efficiently manage the exploration/exploitation challenge of this optimization process. Third, it leverages expert knowledge to constrain and bootstrap initial exploration of the MAB, while requiring only coarse guidance information of the expert and allowing the system to deal with didactic gaps in its knowledge.

[1]  Thomas Zeugmann,et al.  Recent Developments in Algorithmic Teaching , 2009, LATA.

[2]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  RAPID: A Reachable Anytime Planner for Imprecisely-sensed Domains , 2010, UAI.

[3]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Limits to accuracy: how well can we do at student modeling? , 2013, EDM.

[4]  Michael Kearns,et al.  On the complexity of teaching , 1991, COLT '91.

[5]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Is Over Practice Necessary? - Improving Learning Efficiency with the Cognitive Tutor through Educational Data Mining , 2007, AIED.

[6]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Faster Teaching by POMDP Planning , 2011, AIED.

[7]  E. Lutton,et al.  Artificial Ant Colonies and E-Learning : An Optimisation of Pedagogical Paths , 2002 .

[8]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  The strategic student approach for life-long exploration and learning , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL).

[9]  Sébastien Bubeck,et al.  Regret Analysis of Stochastic and Nonstochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problems , 2012, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[10]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Inferring learners' knowledge from observed actions , 2012, EDM.

[11]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  New Potentials for Data-Driven Intelligent Tutoring System Development and Optimization , 2013, AI Mag..

[12]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Multi-Armed Bandits for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2013, EDM.

[13]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[14]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Identifiability: A Fundamental Problem of Student Modeling , 2007, User Modeling.

[15]  S. Engeser,et al.  Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance , 2008 .

[16]  Emma Brunskill,et al.  The Impact on Individualizing Student Models on Necessary Practice Opportunities , 2012, EDM.

[17]  Manuel Lopes,et al.  Algorithmic and Human Teaching of Sequential Decision Tasks , 2012, AAAI.

[18]  Didier Roy Usage d'un robot pour la rem ediation en math ematiques , 2012 .

[19]  V. Shute SteAlth ASSeSSment in computer-BASed GAmeS to Support leArninG , 2011 .

[20]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[21]  Anna N. Rafferty,et al.  ChemVLab+: Evaluating a Virtual Lab Tutor for High School Chemistry , 2012, ICLS.

[22]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Peter Auer,et al.  The Nonstochastic Multiarmed Bandit Problem , 2002, SIAM J. Comput..

[24]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[25]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Learning Factors Analysis - A General Method for Cognitive Model Evaluation and Improvement , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[26]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[27]  Jack Mostow,et al.  Dynamic Cognitive Tracing: Towards Unified Discovery of Student and Cognitive Models , 2012, EDM.

[28]  Carol D. Lee Signifying in the Zone of Proximal Development , 2000 .

[29]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Goes To School in the Big City , 1997 .

[30]  Jacqueline Bourdeau,et al.  Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2010 .

[31]  D. Berlyne Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[32]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.