Drug delivery's quest for polymers: Where are the frontiers?

Since the legendary 1964 article of Folkman and Long entitled "The use of silicone rubber as a carrier for prolonged drug therapy" the role of polymers in controlled drug delivery has come a long way. Today it is evident that polymers play a crucial if not the prime role in this field. The latest boost owes to the interest in drug delivery for the purpose of tissue engineering in regenerative medicine. The focus of this commentary is on a selection of general and personal observations that are characteristic for the current state of polymer therapeutics and carriers. It briefly highlights selected examples for the long march of synthetic polymer-drug conjugates from bench to bedside, comments on the ambivalence of selected polymers as inert excipients versus biological response modifiers, and on the yet unsolved dilemma of cationic polymers for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics. Further subjects are the complex design of multifunctional polymeric carriers including recent concepts towards functional supramolecular polymers, as well as observations on stimuli-sensitive polymers and the currently ongoing trend towards natural and naturally-derived biopolymers. The final topic is the discovery and early development of a novel type of biodegradable polyesters for parenteral use. Altogether, it is not the basic and applied research in polymer therapeutics and carriers, but the translational process that is the key hurdle to proceed towards an authoritative approval of new polymer therapeutics and carriers.

[1]  J. Siepmann,et al.  Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). , 2001 .

[2]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Physical and chemical aspects of stabilization of compounds in silk , 2012, Biopolymers.

[3]  Vladimir P Torchilin,et al.  Tat peptide-mediated intracellular delivery of pharmaceutical nanocarriers. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[4]  Francesco M Veronese,et al.  State of the art in PEGylation: the great versatility achieved after forty years of research. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[5]  W. Hennink,et al.  Polyurethane-based drug delivery systems. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[6]  Allan S Hoffman,et al.  Hydrogels for biomedical applications. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[7]  F M Muggia,et al.  Complement activation following first exposure to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil): possible role in hypersensitivity reactions. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  R. Gurny,et al.  A novel cyclosporin a aqueous formulation for dry eye treatment: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk fibroin biomaterials for controlled release drug delivery , 2011, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[10]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Action and reaction: the biological response to siRNA and its delivery vehicles. , 2012, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[11]  E. W. Meijer,et al.  Functional Supramolecular Polymers , 2012, Science.

[12]  L. Meinel,et al.  Silk fibroin as a vehicle for drug delivery applications. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  Jung-Hwan Park,et al.  Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[14]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Stabilization of vaccines and antibiotics in silk and eliminating the cold chain , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  R. Gurny,et al.  Novel cyclosporin A formulations using MPEG-hexyl-substituted polylactide micelles: a suitability study. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[16]  D. Irvine,et al.  Particulate vaccines: on the quest for optimal delivery and immune response. , 2011, Drug discovery today.

[17]  Robert Gurny,et al.  Poly(hexyl-substituted lactides): novel injectable hydrophobic drug delivery systems. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[18]  Wayne R. Gombotz,et al.  Protein release from alginate matrices. , 1998, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[19]  Wim E. Hennink,et al.  Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels , 2002 .

[20]  P. Baldrick The safety of chitosan as a pharmaceutical excipient. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[21]  R. Gurny,et al.  Solutions for Lipophilic Drugs: A Biodegradable Polymer Acting as Solvent, Matrix, and Carrier to Solve Drug Delivery Issues , 2011, The International journal of artificial organs.

[22]  Donald A Tomalia,et al.  Dendrimers in biomedical applications--reflections on the field. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[23]  David L Kaplan,et al.  The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[24]  K. Howard,et al.  Polycation-based nanoparticle delivery of RNAi therapeutics: adverse effects and solutions. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[25]  K. Schwarz,et al.  Peptide nanofibrils boost retroviral gene transfer and provide a rapid means for concentrating viruses. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[26]  S. Moghimi,et al.  Causative factors behind poloxamer 188 (Pluronic F68, Flocor)-induced complement activation in human sera. A protective role against poloxamer-mediated complement activation by elevated serum lipoprotein levels. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[27]  D. Escande,et al.  A nonionic amphiphile agent promotes gene delivery in vivo to skeletal and cardiac muscles. , 2002, Human gene therapy.

[28]  N. Udupa,et al.  In Situ Forming Polymeric Drug Delivery Systems , 2009, Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[29]  S. Moghimi,et al.  Critical issues in site-specific targeting of solid tumours: the carrier, the tumour barriers and the bioavailable drug , 2008, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[30]  F. Davis,et al.  Effect of covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol on immunogenicity and circulating life of bovine liver catalase. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  Thorsteinn Loftsson,et al.  Cyclodextrins as pharmaceutical solubilizers. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[32]  R. Gurny,et al.  Single processing step toward injectable sustained-release formulations of Triptorelin based on a novel degradable semi-solid polymer. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[33]  J. Folkman,et al.  THE USE OF SILICONE RUBBER AS A CARRIER FOR PROLONGED DRUG THERAPY. , 1964, The Journal of surgical research.

[34]  D. Kaplan,et al.  In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[35]  Y. Bae,et al.  Thermosensitive sol-gel reversible hydrogels. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[36]  Alexander V Kabanov,et al.  Pluronic block copolymers: evolution of drug delivery concept from inert nanocarriers to biological response modifiers. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[37]  M. Morbidelli,et al.  Process for protein PEGylation. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[38]  Ronald A Siegel,et al.  Stimuli sensitive polymers and self regulated drug delivery systems: a very partial review. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[39]  Svetlana Gelperina,et al.  Transport of drugs across the blood-brain barrier by nanoparticles. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[40]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Squalenoylation: a generic platform for nanoparticular drug delivery. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[41]  Sanjay K. Jain,et al.  PEGylation: an approach for drug delivery. A review. , 2008, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[42]  J. Kreuter Nanoparticles--a historical perspective. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[43]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Self-assembly of squalene-based nucleolipids: relating the chemical structure of the bioconjugates to the architecture of the nanoparticles. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[44]  R. Gurny,et al.  Novel micelle carriers for cyclosporin A topical ocular delivery: in vivo cornea penetration, ocular distribution and efficacy studies. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[45]  R. J. Lee,et al.  Targeted drug delivery via the folate receptor. , 2000, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[46]  K. Regnström,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles in Mouse Lung Tissue after Administration of Two Cationic Polymers Used for Nonviral Gene Delivery , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[47]  Anne J Meinel Cell instructive silk fibroin scaffolds for tissue engineering , 2010 .

[48]  Jayanth Panyam,et al.  Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. , 2003, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[49]  F. Kirchhoff,et al.  Peptide nanofibrils as enhancers of retroviral gene transfer. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[50]  R. Singhal,et al.  Poly (glutamic acid)--an emerging biopolymer of commercial interest. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[51]  Ick Chan Kwon,et al.  Engineered polymers for advanced drug delivery. , 2009, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[52]  M. Shive,et al.  Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres , 1997 .

[53]  Neeraj Kumar,et al.  Self assembling polymers as polymersomes for drug delivery. , 2011, Current pharmaceutical design.

[54]  L. Meinel,et al.  Impact of IGF-I release kinetics on bone healing: a preliminary study in sheep. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[55]  R Langer,et al.  Responsive polymeric delivery systems. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[56]  H. Merkle,et al.  Particulate formulations for the delivery of poly(I:C) as vaccine adjuvant. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[57]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Biocompatibility and osteoconduction of macroporous silk fibroin implants in cortical defects in sheep. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[58]  Rudolf Zentel,et al.  Overcoming the PEG-addiction: well-defined alternatives to PEG, from structure–property relationships to better defined therapeutics , 2011 .

[59]  J. V. Hest,et al.  Protein-based materials, toward a new level of structural control. , 2001, Chemical communications.

[60]  H. Ghandehari,et al.  Controlled release from recombinant polymers. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[61]  Alexander V Kabanov,et al.  Polymer genomics: an insight into pharmacology and toxicology of nanomedicines. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[62]  L. Brannon-Peppas,et al.  Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[63]  David L Kaplan,et al.  The use of sulfonated silk fibroin derivatives to control binding, delivery and potency of FGF-2 in tissue regeneration. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[64]  M. Bentley,et al.  Chemistry for peptide and protein PEGylation. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[65]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[66]  D. Schmaljohann Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[67]  Kinam Park,et al.  Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery , 2001 .

[68]  R. Gurny,et al.  In vivo biocompatibility, sustained-release and stability of triptorelin formulations based on a liquid, degradable polymer. , 2013, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[69]  N. Kaji,et al.  A DNA microarray-based analysis of the host response to a nonviral gene carrier: a strategy for improving the immune response. , 2011, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[70]  K. Kataoka,et al.  Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[71]  H. Klok,et al.  Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[72]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk constructs for delivery of musculoskeletal therapeutics. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[73]  H. Merkle,et al.  Modulation of allergic responses in mice by using biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. , 2004, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[74]  M. Vicent,et al.  Polymer therapeutics-prospects for 21st century: the end of the beginning. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[75]  R. Langer,et al.  Magnetic modulation of release of macromolecules from polymers. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  D. Tomalia,et al.  CommentaryDendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections on the field☆☆☆ , 2012 .

[77]  Kazunori Kataoka,et al.  PEGylated Nanoparticles for Biological and Pharmaceutical Applications , 2003 .

[78]  David A Tirrell,et al.  Protein engineering approaches to biomaterials design. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[79]  May Griffith,et al.  Applications of self-assembling peptide scaffolds in regenerative medicine: the way to the clinic. , 2014, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[80]  J. Tschopp,et al.  Uptake of particulate vaccine adjuvants by dendritic cells activates the NALP3 inflammasome , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  Lorenz Meinel,et al.  Biopolymer-based growth factor delivery for tissue repair: from natural concepts to engineered systems. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[82]  J. Kreuter,et al.  Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs. , 2001 .

[83]  Allan S. Hoffman,et al.  The origins and evolution of "controlled" drug delivery systems. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[84]  F. Davis The origin of pegnology. , 2002, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.

[85]  R. Gurny,et al.  Solutions as solutions--synthesis and use of a liquid polyester excipient to dissolve lipophilic drugs and formulate sustained-release parenterals. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[86]  Srinivas Madduri,et al.  Growth factor delivery systems and repair strategies for damaged peripheral nerves. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.