How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster

Abstract Regional technology clusters are an important source of economic development, yet in biotechnology few successful clusters exist. Previous research links successful clusters to heightened innovation capacity achieved through the existence of social ties linking individuals across companies. Less understood are the mechanisms by which such networks emerge. The article uses social network analysis to examine the emergence of social networks linking senior managers employed in biotechnology firms in San Diego, California. Labor mobility within the region has forged a large network linking managers and firms, while ties linking managers of an early company, Hybritech, formed a network backbone anchoring growth in the region.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[3]  Harvey Molotch,et al.  The Regional World , 1998 .

[4]  James N. Baron,et al.  Organizational Blueprints for Success in High-Tech Start-Ups: Lessons from the Stanford Project on Emerging Companies , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[5]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Getting Off to a Good Start: The Effects of Upper Echelon Affiliations on Underwriter Prestige , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Emergent Properties of a New Financial Market: American Venture Capital Syndication, 1960 - 2005 , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[7]  P. Krugman Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[8]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[9]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme? , 2006 .

[10]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1996 .

[11]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[12]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[13]  Richard Swedberg,et al.  Explorations in Economic Sociology , 1996 .

[14]  Hugh Gunz Career Imprints: Creating Leaders Across an Industry , 2007 .

[15]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Getting Off to a Good Start: The Effects of Upper Echelon Affiliations on Interorganizational Endorsements , 2003 .

[17]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[18]  H. Penan R & D strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer's disease therapeutic strategies , 1996 .

[19]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex , 1986 .

[20]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[22]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[23]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Fiona E. Murray The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[25]  Fiona E. Murray,et al.  Examining the Marketplace for Ideas: How Local are Europe’s Biotechnology Clusters? , 2004 .

[26]  Ronald J. Gilson,et al.  The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete , 1998 .

[27]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Executive Stock Option Repricing: Retention and Performance Reconsidered , 2002 .

[28]  M. Kenney Understanding silicon valley : the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region , 2000 .

[29]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Venture capital-financed innovation and technological change in the USA , 1988 .

[31]  R. Whitley,et al.  Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK , 2004 .

[32]  H. Bahrami,et al.  Flexible Re-Cycling and High-Technology Entrepreneurship , 1995 .

[33]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[34]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Careers and Clusters: Analyzing the Career Network Dynamic of Biotechnology Clusters , 2005 .

[35]  C. Sabel Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy , 1993 .

[36]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[38]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership: The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: Interactions Among Scientific, Institutional, and Organizational Change , 1999 .

[39]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[40]  W. Powell Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[41]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .