DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize.

It has long been suspected that maize is the product of an historical tetraploid event. Several observations support this possibility, including the fact that the maize genome contains duplicated chromosomal segments with colinear gene arrangements. Some of the genes from these duplicated segments have been sequenced. In this study, we examine the pattern of sequence divergence among 14 pairs of duplicated genes. We compare the pattern of divergence to patterns predicted by four models of the evolution of the maize genome-autotetraploidy, genomic allotetraploidy, segmental allotetraploidy, and multiple segmental duplications. Our analyses indicate that coalescent times for duplicated sequences fall into two distinct groups, corresponding to roughly 20.5 and 11.4 million years. This observation strongly discounts the possibility that the maize genome is the product of a genomic allotetraploid event, and it is also difficult to reconcile with either autotetraploidy or multiple independent segmental duplications. However, the presence of two (and only two) coalescent times is predicted by the segmental allotetraploid model. If the maize genome is the product of a segmental allotetraploid event, as these data suggest, then its two diploid progenitors diverged roughly 20.5 million years ago (Mya), and the allotetraploid event probably occurred approximately 11.4 Mya. Comparison of maize and sorghum sequences suggests that one of the two ancestral diploids shares a more recent common ancestor with sorghum than it does with the other ancestral diploid.

[1]  B. Gaut,et al.  Molecular evolution of the Adh1 locus in the genus Zea. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M T Clegg,et al.  Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. Nei,et al.  Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  B. Gaut,et al.  Evolution of alcohol dehydrogenase genes in the palm and grass families. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  E. Waters.  The molecular evolution of the small heat-shock proteins in plants. , 1995, Genetics.

[6]  W. Gain.  Variation and Evolution. , 1893, Science.

[7]  R. Greenberg.  Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[8]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Synonymous nucleotide substitution rates in mammalian genes: implications for the molecular clock and the relationship of mammalian orders. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Wendel,et al.  Duplicated plastid and triplicated cytosolic isozymes of triosephosphate isomerase in maize (Zea mays L.). , 1989, The Journal of heredity.

[10]  T. Helentjaris,et al.  Identification of the genomic locations of duplicate nucleotide sequences in maize by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. , 1988, Genetics.

[11]  J. W. Dudley,et al.  Corn and Corn Improvement , 1955 .

[12]  M. Tyers,et al.  Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones encoding a functional p34cdc2 homologue from Zea mays. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Wessler,et al.  Molecular evolution of the plant R regulatory gene family. , 1994, Genetics.

[14]  S. Muse,et al.  A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  S. Muse,et al.  Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  D. Mindell.  Fundamentals of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[17]  Rhodora , 1899, The American Naturalist.

[18]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Chromosomal evolution in higher plants , 1971 .

[19]  S. Muse,et al.  Comparing patterns of nucleotide substitution rates among chloroplast loci using the relative ratio test. , 1997, Genetics.

[20]  J. Doebley,et al.  Comparative genome mapping of Sorghum and maize. , 1992, Genetics.

[21]  M. Gouy,et al.  Date of the monocot-dicot divergence estimated from chloroplast DNA sequence data. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[23]  A. Eyre-Walker.  Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution . By Li Wen-Hsiung and Graur Dan. Sinauer Associates Inc. 1991. 284 pages. £16.95. ISBN 0 87893 452 9. , 1991 .

[24]  T. Ohta,et al.  On some principles governing molecular evolution. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  G. Learn,et al.  Evolution of the chalcone synthase gene family in the genus Ipomoea. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Soltis,et al.  Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy , 1993 .

[27]  M. Rhoades.  Duplicate Genes in Maize , 1951, The American Naturalist.

[28]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Variation and Evolution in Plants , 1951 .

[29]  S. Wessler,et al.  Isolation and characterization of rice R genes: evidence for distinct evolutionary paths in rice and maize. , 1996, Genetics.

[30]  P. Lu,et al.  Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.