Public Acceptability of Introducing a Biogas Mandate in Korea: A Contingent Valuation Study

Biogas (BG), a renewable form of energy, can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, unlike conventional gas. Thus, the Korean Government is considering the introduction of a BG mandate, in which the legal blend is 2% BG and 98% conventional gas (BG2), by 2020 to expand BG use. We should examine the public acceptability of the introduction, which will incur a rise in the gas price. This study attempts to assess the public’s willingness to pay (WTP) for introducing the BG2 program in Korea. The WTP data were obtained from a one-and-one-half-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation survey of 1000 households. Because a considerable number of the respondents (63.4%) gave a zero WTP response, we applied a spike model to treat the WTP data with zero observations. The yearly mean WTP was computed as 2539 Korean won (KRW) (USD 2.5) per household for the next 10 years, which is also statistically meaningful at the 1% level. Expanding the value to the national population gives us KRW 50.7 billion (USD 49.5 million) per year. The present value of the total public WTP amounts to KRW 372.7 billion (USD 368.4 million) using a social discount rate of 5.5%. We can conclude that gas consumers in Korea are ready to shoulder some of the financial burden of expanding the use of BG.

[1]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Decoy Effects in Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation: Asymmetric Dominance , 2008, Land Economics.

[2]  Patricia A. Duffy,et al.  Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Biopower: Results from Focus Groups , 2008 .

[3]  B. Kriström.  Spike Models in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[4]  Seung-Hoon Yoo,et al.  WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GREEN ELECTRICITY IN KOREA: A CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDY , 2009 .

[5]  Jeffrey Englin,et al.  Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods , 1997 .

[6]  Tobias Börger,et al.  Keeping up appearances: Motivations for socially desirable responding in contingent valuation interviews , 2013 .

[7]  Magdalena Muradin,et al.  Potential for Producing Biogas from Agricultural Waste in Rural Plants in Poland , 2014 .

[8]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[9]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[10]  Economic Valuation of the Environment: How Citizens Make Sense of Contingent Valuation Questions , 2003, Land Economics.

[11]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  E. Zervas,et al.  Public acceptance of biofuels , 2010 .

[13]  K. Train,et al.  An Adding-up Test on Contingent Valuations of River and Lake Quality , 2015, Land Economics.

[14]  Jay R. Corrigan,et al.  Three reasons to use annual payments in contingent valuation surveys: Convergent validity, discount rates, and mental accounting ☆ , 2015 .

[15]  Cliff C. J. Huang,et al.  A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys , 2005 .

[16]  R. Kopp,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 2003 .

[17]  S. Miccoli,et al.  Social Evaluation Approaches in Landscape Projects , 2014 .

[18]  D. Petrolia,et al.  Do Americans Want Ethanol? A Comparative Contingent-Valuation Study of Willingness to Pay for E-10 and E-85 , 2008 .

[19]  S. Yoo,et al.  Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys , 2002 .

[20]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[21]  Francesco Testa,et al.  Factors affecting drivers' willingness to pay for biofuels: The case of Italy , 2016 .

[22]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[23]  M. Soliño,et al.  Designing a forest-energy policy to reduce forest fires in Galicia (Spain): A contingent valuation application , 2010 .

[24]  C.Y. Jim,et al.  Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: Implications for Contingent Valuation Method , 2015 .

[25]  B. Solomon,et al.  Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol , 2009 .

[26]  K. McConnell.  Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation , 1990 .

[27]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Incentives , 2002, Land Economics.

[28]  Chin-Huang Huang,et al.  Estimating the Total Economic Value of Cultivated Flower Land in Taiwan , 2015 .

[29]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[30]  Teresa Del Giudice,et al.  Fossil energy versus nuclear, wind, solar and agricultural biomass: Insights from an Italian national survey , 2012 .

[31]  J. L. Santos,et al.  Estimating the demand curve for sustainable use of pesticides from contingent-valuation data , 2016 .

[32]  Steven F. Koch,et al.  Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia : controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM , 2015 .

[33]  Alberto Longo,et al.  Sequence Effects in the Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs Using the Contingent Valuation Method , 2015, Land Economics.

[34]  E. Ezebilo,et al.  Willingness to pay for improved residential waste management in a developing country , 2013, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[35]  M. Hanemann,et al.  One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[36]  F. Arion,et al.  Analysis of Factors that Influence the Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water in the Kurdistan Regional Government, Iraq , 2015 .

[37]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a "Scope" Test? A Meta-analysis , 1996 .

[38]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation , 2001 .

[39]  J. Whitehead.  Plausible Responsiveness To Scope In Contingent Valuation , 2016 .

[40]  S. Venanzi,et al.  Environmental Sustainability and Economic Benefits of Dairy Farm Biogas Energy Production: A Case Study in Umbria , 2014 .

[41]  Min-Kyu Lee,et al.  Public's willingness to pay for a marina port in Korea: A contingent valuation study , 2016 .

[42]  G. Parsons,et al.  Fat tails and truncated bids in contingent valuation: An application to an endangered shorebird species , 2016 .

[43]  Terry L. Anderson,et al.  Valuing Non-Marketed Goods: The Case of Elk Permit Lotteries☆ , 2001 .

[44]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[45]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1987 .

[46]  Sun Young Park,et al.  The conservation value of the Shinan Tidal Flat in Korea: a contingent valuation study , 2013 .

[47]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Social Choice , 1994 .