Prostate Cancer Segmentation Using Multispectral Random Walks

Several studies have shown the advantages of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a noninvasive imaging technique for prostate cancer localization. However, a large proportion of these studies are with human readers. There is a significant inter and intra-observer variability for human readers, and it is substantially difficult for humans to analyze the large dataset of multispectral MRI. To solve these problems a few studies were proposed for fully automated cancer localization in the past. However, fully automated methods are highly sensitive to parameter selection and often may not produce desirable segmentation results. In this paper, we present a semi-supervised segmentation algorithm by extending a graph based semi-supervised random walker algorithm to perform prostate cancer segmentation with multi-spectral MRI. Unlike classical random walker which can be applied only to dataset of single type of MRI, we develop a new method that can be applied to multispectral images. We prove the effectiveness of the proposed method by presenting the qualitative and quantitative results of multispectral MRI datasets acquired from 10 biopsy-confirmed cancer patients. Our results demonstrate that the multispectral MRI noticeably increases the sensitivity and jakkard measures of prostate cancer localization compared to single MR images; 0.71 sensitivity and 0.56 jakkard for multispectral images compared to 0.51 sensitivity and 0.44 jakkard for single MR image based segmentation.

[1]  M. Sumura,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[2]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[3]  Jianbo Shi,et al.  Graph Embedding to Improve Supervised Classification and Novel Class Detection: Application to Prostate Cancer , 2005, MICCAI.

[4]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Semi-supervised prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[5]  William Wells,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. , 2003, Medical physics.

[6]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Prostate Cancer Localization With Multispectral MRI Using Cost-Sensitive Support Vector Machines and Conditional Random Fields , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Jurgen J Fütterer,et al.  Imaging modalities for prostate cancer , 2009, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[8]  Leo Grady,et al.  Random Walks for Image Segmentation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  T. Stamey,et al.  The abnormal prostate: MR imaging at 1.5 T with histopathologic correlation. , 1987, Radiology.

[11]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Xin Liu,et al.  Prostate Cancer Segmentation With Simultaneous Estimation of Markov Random Field Parameters and Class , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Smoothing low-SNR molecular images via anisotropic median-diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2005, 8th International Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA, October 26-29, 2005, Proceedings, Part II , 2005, MICCAI.

[15]  R. Fisher Statistical methods for research workers , 1927, Protoplasma.