Intrinsic array structure is neither necessary nor sufficient for nonegocentric coding of spatial layouts

Mou and McNamara (2002) have recently theorized that nonegocentric reference frames (viz., intrinsic reference frames, based on the spatial structure of a configuration of objects) are used to organize spatial relationships in memory. The theory has not made claims about whether the intrinsic structure of a stimulus array is necessary or sufficient for such nonegocentric coding. We demonstrate that salient intrinsic axes in a layout of objects are neither necessary nor sufficient for people to use a nonegocentric reference frame in organizing spatial memory. In Experiment 1, participants were successfully instructed to adopt a nonegocentric preferred direction in memory for an array of objects with no salient intrinsic reference axes. In Experiment 2, with no instructions, participants adopted an egocentric preferred direction for an array with a salient intrinsic axis. These results suggest that physically salient array structure exerts a minimal influence in the coding of spatial memory through nonegocentric reference frames.

[1]  T. McNamara,et al.  Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  How Are the Locations of Objects in the Environment Represented in Memory? , 2003, Spatial Cognition.

[5]  Y A Féry,et al.  Attenuation of Alignment Effect with Exocentric Encoding of Location , 2000, Perception.

[6]  T. McNamara,et al.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory , 2002 .

[7]  E. Spelke,et al.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation , 2000, Cognition.

[8]  B. Tversky,et al.  Searching imagined environments. , 1990 .

[9]  T. McNamara,et al.  Multiple views of spatial memory , 1997 .

[10]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  J. Rieser.  Access to Knowledge of Spatial Structure at Novel Points of Observation , 1989 .

[13]  M. Jeanne Sholl,et al.  Egocentric frames of reference used for the retrieval of survey knowledge learned by map and navigation , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[14]  S. Levinson.  Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[15]  Ewald Neumann,et al.  Testing for predicted patterns: When interest in the whole is greater than in some of its parts. , 1999 .

[16]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[17]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[18]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance , 1985 .

[20]  T. McNamara,et al.  Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  View dependence in scene recognition after active learning , 1999, Memory & cognition.