Managing technology-based projects in multinational environments

This paper examines the managerial issues involved in executing technology-based projects that span international borders. The results of a bilateral comparative field study, conducted in Brazil and the United States, show that in spite of considerable social and cultural differences between two international operating environments, successful integration of multinational projects may not require fundamentally different management approaches. This, however, does require strong senior management support and efforts in developing effective organizational linkages and alliances. Managers must need to have focus on cross-boundary relationships and fine-tune their people skills to deal effectively with complex forms of negotiations, delegations, and commitments in systems which are often weak on formal command and control.

[1]  David H. Gobeli,et al.  Improving the Process of Product Innovation , 1993 .

[2]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  External-internal linkages and overseas autonomy-control tension: the management dilemma of the Japanese R&D in Europe , 1996 .

[3]  Christiana Smith Shi,et al.  Global Retailing: Tempting Trouble? , 1996 .

[4]  Antonio J. Bailetti,et al.  A coordination structure approach to the management of projects , 1994 .

[5]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  Organization, autonomy, and success of internationally dispersed R&D facilities , 1996 .

[6]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Managing the management tools , 1994 .

[7]  Biren Prasad,et al.  A structured approach to product and process optimization for manufacturing and service industries , 1995 .

[8]  D. Mowery,et al.  Managing Product Definition in High-Technology Industries: A Pilot Study , 1994 .

[9]  S. Ohba,et al.  Critical issues related to international R&D programs , 1996 .

[10]  K. Clark,et al.  Organizing and Leading “Heavyweight” Development Teams , 1992 .

[11]  Brian Dumaine,et al.  The Trouble with Teams. , 1994 .

[12]  J. David Roessner,et al.  Industry Interaction with Federal Labs Pays Off , 1993 .

[13]  R. Keller,et al.  A multinational study of work climate, job satisfaction, and the productivity of R&D teams , 1996 .

[14]  Robert J. Graham.  Project Management As If People Mattered , 1989 .

[15]  Burton V. Dean,et al.  Multiproject staff scheduling with variable resource constraints , 1992 .

[16]  Peter Kayes,et al.  How ICL used project management techniques to introduce a new product range , 1995 .

[17]  J F Rockart,et al.  Systems delivery: evolving new strategies. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[18]  J. C. Higgins,et al.  Some perspectives on the use of management science techniques in R&D management , 1986 .

[19]  J. K. McCollum,et al.  The effects of matrix organization size and number of project assignments on performance , 1991 .

[20]  Quentin C. Turtle.  Implementing concurrent project management , 1994 .

[21]  Peter Gwynne.  Managing ‘Multidomestic’ R&D at ABB , 1995 .

[22]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  Managing Technology-Based Projects: A Comparison of the Practices of Brazil and the United States , 1997 .

[23]  C. Hart,et al.  Guarantees come to professional service firms. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[24]  Robert G. Eccles,et al.  Improving the Corporate Disclosure Process , 1995 .

[25]  Jean-Philippe Deschamps,et al.  Fomenting a customer obsession , 1995 .

[26]  H. Bahrami.  The Emerging Flexible Organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley , 1992 .

[27]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Rebuilding Behavioral Context: Turn Process Reengineering into People Rejuvenation , 1995 .

[28]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Managing the internationalization of R&D activities , 1996 .

[29]  R. Balachandra,et al.  A comparison of R&D project termination factors in four industrial nations , 1996 .

[30]  Greiner Le,et al.  The paradox of managing a project-oriented matrix: establishing coherence within chaos. , 1981 .

[31]  M. J. Earl,et al.  The Risks of Outsourcing IT , 1996 .

[32]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  The Leadership Factor@@@Leadership and Innovation@@@Making a Leadership Change@@@Thriving on Chaos, Handbook for a Management Revolution , 1989 .

[33]  Tzvi Raz.  Introduction of the Project Management Discipline in a Software Development Organization , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[34]  Evert Van de Vliert,et al.  Why cross-national differences in role overload? Don't overlook ambient temperature! , 1996 .

[35]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Coordination of Information Technology Management: Team-Based Structures and Computer-based Communication Systems , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos , 1985 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[38]  Mariano Corso,et al.  A multi-project management framework for new product development , 1994 .

[39]  George Chryssochoidis,et al.  Rolling out new products across country markets: An empirical study of causes of delays , 1998 .

[40]  E. Martinez.  Successful Reengineering Demands IS/Business Partnerships , 1995 .

[41]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Swimming in Newstreams: Mastering Innovation Dilemmas , 1989 .

[42]  H. Thamhain.  Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success , 1990 .

[43]  L. Willcocks,et al.  The Value of Selective IT Sourcing , 1996 .

[44]  Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos,et al.  The future of technology management , 1994 .

[45]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  From theory to practice: toward a typology of project-management styles , 1998 .

[46]  Gloria Barczak,et al.  Communications patterns of new product development team leaders , 1991 .

[47]  W A Randolph,et al.  What every manager needs to know about project management. , 1988, Sloan management review.

[48]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Building high performing engineering project teams , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[49]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[50]  J. P. Solomond.  International high technology cooperation: lessons learned , 1996 .

[51]  J. A. kernaghan,et al.  The contribution of the group process to successful project planning in R&D settings , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[52]  Roberto Sbragia,et al.  R&D in Brazilian Industry: Recent Indicators , 1996 .