One hundred five penetrating cardiac injuries: a 2-year prospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVES To analyze the parameters measured in the field, during transport, and upon arrival of the physiologic condition of patients sustaining penetrating cardiac injuries, along with the Cardiovascular Respiratory Score (CVRS) component of the Trauma Score, the mechanism and anatomical site of injury, operative characteristics, and cardiac rhythm as predictors of outcome. We also set out to identify a set of patient characteristics that best predict mortality outcome and to correlate cardiac injury grade as determined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) with mortality. METHODS This report was a prospective study at American College of Surgeons Level I urban trauma center. Interventions included thoracotomy, sternotomy, or both, for resuscitation and definitive repair of cardiac injury. The main outcome measures used were those parameters measuring physiologic condition of patients, CVRS, mechanism and anatomical site of injury, mortality, and grade of injury. RESULTS A total of 105 patients sustained penetrating cardiac injuries: 68 injuries (65%) were gunshot wounds and 37 injuries (35%) were stab wounds. The mean Injury Severity Score was 36. Of the 105 wounds, 23 wounds (22%) involved multiple-chamber injuries. The overall survival was 35 of 105 patients (33%): survival of gunshot wound victims was 11 of 68 patients (16%); survival of stab wound victims was 24 of 37 patients (65%). Emergency department thoracotomy was performed in 71 of the 105 patients (68%) with 10 survivors (14%). CVRS: 94% mortality (50 of 53) when CVRS = 0, 89% mortality (57 of 64) when CVRS = 0 to 3, and 31% mortality (12 of 39) when CVRS 4 to 11 (p < 0.001). The presence of sinus rhythm when pericardium was opened predicted survival (p < 0.001). Anatomical site of injury (injured chamber) and the presence of tamponade did not predict survival. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified gunshot wound, exsanguination, and restoration of blood pressure as most predictive variables of mortality. AAST-OIS injury grade and mortality: grade I, 0 of 1 (0%); grade II, 1 of 2 (50%); grade III, 2 of 3 (66%); grade IV, 28 of 50 (56%); grade V, 29 of 38 (76%); grade VI, 10 of 11 (91%). Overall incidence: grades IV-VI, 99 of 105 (94%). CONCLUSIONS Parameters measuring physiologic condition, CVRS, and mechanism of injury are significant predictors of outcome in penetrating cardiac injuries. AAST-OIS injury grades I-III are rare in penetrating cardiac trauma. AAST-OIS Injury grades IV-VI are common in penetrating cardiac trauma and accurately predict outcome.

[1]  G. Velmahos,et al.  Penetrating cardiac injuries: a prospective study of variables predicting outcomes. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[2]  J. Asensio,et al.  Penetrating cardiac injuries. , 1996, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[3]  L. Jacobson,et al.  Penetrating chest trauma: should indications for emergency room thoracotomy be limited? , 1996, The American surgeon.

[4]  M. K. Allen,et al.  Double jeopardy: thoracoabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention in both chest and abdomen. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  H. Belzberg,et al.  The impact of a dedicated trauma program on outcome in severely injured patients. , 1995, Archives of surgery.

[6]  G. Velmahos,et al.  Penetrating cardiac injuries: Clinical classification and management strategy , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  D. Morabito,et al.  Limited utility of emergency department thoracotomy. , 1994, The American surgeon.

[8]  Kaplan Aj,et al.  Predictors of mortality in penetrating cardiac injury. , 1993 .

[9]  C. Caputo,et al.  Penetrating cardiac wounds: prospective study of factors influencing initial resuscitation. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  R. Markison,et al.  Cardiac stapling in the management of penetrating injuries of the heart: rapid control of hemorrhage and decreased risk of personal contamination. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  R. Rhodes,et al.  Surgical approach of choice for penetrating cardiac wounds. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  A. Ney,et al.  Survival after emergency department versus operating room thoracotomy for penetrating cardiac injuries. , 1993, The American surgeon.

[13]  P. Barnard,et al.  Penetrating cardiac trauma: management strategy based on 129 surgical emergencies over 2 years. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Penetrating cardiac injuries. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  H. L. Laws,et al.  Demography of penetrating cardiac trauma. , 1989, Annals of surgery.

[16]  Mandal Ak,et al.  Unusually low mortality of penetrating wounds of the chest. Twelve years' experience. , 1989 .

[17]  E. Moore,et al.  Pericardial tamponade: a critical determinant for survival following penetrating cardiac wounds. , 1986, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  R. Roberge,et al.  Emergency department thoracotomy for penetrating injuries: predictive value of patient classification. , 1986, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[19]  J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Management of penetrating cardiac injuries: the role of emergency room thoracotomy. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  D. Feliciano,et al.  Civilian trauma in the 1980s. A 1-year experience with 456 vascular and cardiac injuries. , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[21]  D. Demetriades Cardiac penetrating injuries: Personal experience of 45 cases , 1984, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  D. Demetriades,et al.  Penetrating injuries of the heart: experience over two years in South Africa. , 1983, Journal of Trauma.

[23]  V. DeGennaro,et al.  Aggressive management of potential penetrating cardiac injuries. , 1980, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  A. Mandal,et al.  Experience in the management of 50 consecutive penetrating wounds of the heart , 1979, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  R. L. Fulton,et al.  Principles for the Management of Penetrating Cardiac Wounds , 1979, Annals of surgery.

[26]  L. Bryant,et al.  Cardiac tamponade following penetrating mediastinal injuries: improved survival with early pericardiocentesis. , 1979, The Journal of trauma.

[27]  R. Lim,et al.  Late sequelae of penetrating cardiac wounds. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[28]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Penetrating cardiac trauma. Experience with thirty-four patients in a hospital without cardiopulmonary bypass capability. , 1976, American journal of surgery.

[29]  P. Symbas,et al.  Penetrating Cardiac Wounds. A Comparison of Different Therapeutic Methods , 1976, Annals of surgery.

[30]  Harvey Jc,et al.  Primary operative management: method of choice for stab wounds to the heart. , 1975 .

[31]  K. Mattox,et al.  Cardiorrhaphy in the emergency center , 1974 .

[32]  M. Debakey,et al.  Penetrating wounds of the heart: changing patterns of surgical management. , 1972, The Journal of trauma.

[33]  R. Wilson,et al.  Gunshot wounds of the heart. , 1972, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[34]  D. Pearlman,et al.  A graded approach to the management of penetrating wounds of the heart. , 1971, Archives of surgery.

[35]  A. Beall,et al.  Gunshot wounds of the heart. Changing patterns of surgical management. , 1971, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[36]  W. Webb,et al.  Penetrating wounds of the heart. , 1968, Texas medicine.

[37]  H. W. Crawford,et al.  Surgical management of penetrating cardiac injuries. , 1966, American journal of surgery.

[38]  M. Debakey,et al.  Penetrating wounds of the heart. , 1938, The Journal of trauma.