Child-Computer Interaction: Recent Works, New Dataset, and Age Detection

We overview recent research in Child-Computer Interaction and describe our framework ChildCI intended for: i) generating a better understanding of the cognitive and neuromotor development of children while interacting with mobile devices, and ii) enabling new applications in e-learning and ehealth, among others. Our framework includes a new mobile application, specific data acquisition protocols, and a first release of the ChildCI dataset (ChildCIdb v1), which is planned to be extended yearly to enable longitudinal studies. In our framework children interact with a tablet device, using both a pen stylus and the finger, performing different tasks that require different levels of neuromotor and cognitive skills. ChildCIdb comprises more than 400 children from 18 months to 8 years old, considering therefore the first three development stages of the Piaget’s theory. In addition, and as a demonstration of the potential of the ChildCI framework, we include experimental results for one of the many applications enabled by ChildCIdb: children age detection based on device interaction. Different machine learning approaches are evaluated, proposing a new set of 34 global features to automatically detect age groups, achieving accuracy results over 90% and interesting findings in terms of the type of features more useful for this task.

[1]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Multi-class AdaBoost ∗ , 2009 .

[2]  Azah Abdul Aziz,et al.  Children’s Interaction with Tablet Applications: Gestures and Interface Design , 2013 .

[3]  Javier Hernandez-Ortega,et al.  Active detection of age groups based on touch interaction , 2018, IET Biom..

[4]  Lucrezia Crescenzi Lanna,et al.  Touch gesture performed by children under 3 years old when drawing and coloring on a tablet , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Radu-Daniel Vatavu,et al.  Touch interaction for children aged 3 to 6 years: Experimental findings and relationship to motor skills , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Child–Computer Interaction in times of a pandemic , 2020, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.

[7]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Sensor Interoperability and Fusion in Signature Verification: A Case Study Using Tablet PC , 2005, IWBRS.

[8]  A. Bastian,et al.  Children with autism show specific handwriting impairments , 2009, Neurology.

[9]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Feature-based dynamic signature verification under forensic scenarios , 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2015).

[10]  Natalia Kucirkova,et al.  Lessons for child–computer interaction studies following the research challenges during the Covid-19 pandemic , 2020, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.

[11]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  Intermediate-Level Knowledge in Child-Computer Interaction: A Call for Action , 2017, IDC.

[12]  A. Kamsin,et al.  The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study , 2020 .

[13]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Multiple classifiers in biometrics. part 1: Fundamentals and review , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[14]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Feature Selection Based on Genetic Algorithms for On-Line Signature Verification , 2007, 2007 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies.

[15]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Preprocessing and Feature Selection for Improved Sensor Interoperability in Online Biometric Signature Verification , 2015, IEEE Access.

[16]  M. M. Oğuz,et al.  Exposure to and use of mobile devices in children aged 1–60 months , 2018, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[17]  Julia Woodward,et al.  Characterizing How Interface Complexity Affects Children's Touchscreen Interactions , 2016, CHI.

[18]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Adapted user-dependent multimodal biometric authentication exploiting general information , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[19]  Javier Hernandez-Ortega,et al.  Modeling the Complexity of Signature and Touch-Screen Biometrics using the Lognormality Principle , 2020, The Lognormality Principle.

[20]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  Touchscreen prompts for preschoolers: designing developmentally appropriate techniques for teaching young children to perform gestures , 2015, IDC.

[21]  Jesús Francisco Vargas-Bonilla,et al.  Characterization of the Handwriting Skills as a Biomarker for Parkinson’s Disease , 2019, 2019 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019).

[22]  Aythami Morales,et al.  DeepWriteSYN: On-Line Handwriting Synthesis via Deep Short-Term Representations , 2020, AAAI.

[23]  Harin Sellahewa,et al.  User-Age Classification Using Touch Gestures on Smartphones , 2015 .

[24]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[25]  Tengku Siti Meriam Tengku Wook,et al.  Children’s Interaction Ability Towards Multi-Touch Gestures , 2016 .

[26]  Vicente Nacher,et al.  Examining the Usability of Touch Screen Gestures for Children With Down Syndrome , 2018, Interact. Comput..

[27]  Miguel A. Ferrer,et al.  Handwriting Biometrics: Applications and Future Trends in e-Security and e-Health , 2020, Cognitive Computation.

[28]  Puspa Inayat Khalid,et al.  Analyses of pupils’ polygonal shape drawing strategy with respect to handwriting performance , 2014, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[29]  Brittany Huber,et al.  Young children's transfer of learning from a touchscreen device , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Elena Navarro,et al.  Multi-touch gestures for pre-kindergarten children , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Lisa Anthony,et al.  Gestures by Children and Adults on Touch Tables and Touch Walls in a Public Science Center , 2016, IDC.

[32]  Seiichiro Hangai,et al.  Signature Features , 2015, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[33]  Radu-Daniel Vatavu,et al.  Child or Adult? Inferring Smartphone Users' Age Group from Touch Measurements Alone , 2015, INTERACT.

[34]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Towards mobile authentication using dynamic signature verification: Useful features and performance evaluation , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[35]  Julian Fierrez,et al.  Benchmarking desktop and mobile handwriting across COTS devices: The e-BioSign biometric database , 2017, PloS one.

[36]  Lisa Anthony,et al.  Designing smarter touch-based interfaces for educational contexts , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[37]  Lorna McKnight,et al.  Children's Interaction with Mobile Touch-Screen Devices: Experiences and Guidelines for Design , 2010, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  Damyanka Tsvyatkova,et al.  A review of selected methods, techniques and tools in Child-Computer Interaction (CCI) developed/adapted to support children's involvement in technology development , 2019, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[40]  Javier Hernandez-Ortega,et al.  Heart Rate Estimation from Face Videos for Student Assessment: Experiments on edBB , 2020, 2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC).

[41]  Réjean Plamondon,et al.  Development of a Sigma-Lognormal representation for on-line signatures , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[42]  R. Plamondon,et al.  Kinematic analysis of fast pen strokes in children with ADHD , 2020, Applied neuropsychology. Child.