Changes in tibialis anterior architecture affect the amplitude of surface electromyograms

BackgroundVariations in the amplitude of surface electromyograms (EMGs) are typically considered to advance inferences on the timing and degree of muscle activation in different circumstances. Surface EMGs are however affected by factors other than the muscle neural drive. In this study, we use electrical stimulation to investigate whether architectural changes in tibialis anterior (TA), a key muscle for balance and gait, affect the amplitude of surface EMGs.MethodsCurrent pulses (500 μs; 2 pps) were applied to the fibular nerve of ten participants, with the ankle at neutral, full dorsi and full plantar flexion positions. Ultrasound images were collected to quantify changes in TA architecture with changes in foot position. The peak-to-peak amplitude of differential M waves, detected with a grid of surface electrodes (16 × 4 electrodes; 10 mm inter-electrode distance), was considered to assess the effect of changes in TA architecture on the surface recordings.ResultsOn average, both TA pennation angle and width increased by respectively 7 deg. and 9 mm when the foot moved from plantar to dorsiflexion (P < 0.02). M-wave amplitudes changed significantly with ankle position. M waves elicited in dorsiflexion and neutral positions were ~25% greater than those obtained during plantar flexion, regardless of where they were detected in the grid (P < 0.001). This figure increased to ~50% when considering bipolar M waves.ConclusionsFindings reported here indicate the changes in EMG amplitude observed during dynamic contractions, especially when changes in TA architecture are expected (e.g., during gait), may not be exclusively conceived as variations in TA activation.

[1]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Muscle architecture and function in humans. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A. Cuesta-Vargas,et al.  Tibialis anterior analysis from functional and architectural perspective during isometric foot dorsiflexion: a cross-sectional study of repeated measures , 2015, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.

[3]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Design of a Portable, Intrinsically Safe Multichannel Acquisition System for High-Resolution, Real-Time Processing HD-sEMG , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Vasilios Baltzopoulos,et al.  The proprioceptive and agonist roles of gastrocnemius, soleus and tibialis anterior muscles in maintaining human upright posture , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  S. Bianchi,et al.  Ultrasound of tibialis anterior muscle and tendon: anatomy, technique of examination, normal and pathologic appearance , 2013, Journal of Ultrasound.

[7]  J. Duysens,et al.  Proactive and reactive mechanisms play a role in stepping on inverting surfaces during gait. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  T. Vieira,et al.  Spatial variation of compound muscle action potentials across human gastrocnemius medialis. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Ultrasound for identification of anatomical landmarks in stereophotogrammetry: a new method for the calibration of the probe , 2006 .

[10]  G. Melchiorri,et al.  A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Gary S Chleboun,et al.  Fascicle length change of the human tibialis anterior and vastus lateralis during walking. , 2007, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[12]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Automatic segmentation of surface EMG images: Improving the estimation of neuromuscular activity. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. Hardin,et al.  Ankle dorsiflexor function after plantar flexor surgery in children with cerebral palsy. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  Ian D. Loram,et al.  Myoelectric activity along human gastrocnemius medialis: Different spatial distributions of postural and electrically elicited surface potentials , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  Alberto Botter,et al.  NEW FRONTIERS FOR MUSCLE FUNCTION INVESTIGATION: INTEGRATION OF SURFACE EMG AND 3D ECOGRAPHIC IMAGES , 2015 .

[17]  S. Sprager,et al.  Feasibility study of detecting surface electromyograms in severely obese patients. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  F. Tok,et al.  Gait Disturbances in Patients With Stroke , 2014, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[20]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Insights gained into the interpretation of surface electromyograms from the gastrocnemius muscles: A simulation study. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Saeed Talebian,et al.  Characteristic muscle activity patterns during gait initiation in the healthy younger and older adults. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[22]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Near- and far-fields: source characteristics and the conducting medium in neurophysiology. , 1997, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[24]  D. Farina,et al.  Effect of joint angle on EMG variables in leg and thigh muscles , 2001, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[25]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  L. Nashner Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Vasilios Baltzopoulos,et al.  Predictability of in vivo changes in pennation angle of human tibialis anterior muscle from rest to maximum isometric dorsiflexion , 1999, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[28]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[29]  John N. Howell,et al.  In vivo Measurement of Fascicle Length and Pennation Angle of the Human Biceps femoris Muscle , 2001, Cells Tissues Organs.

[30]  P H Veltink,et al.  Surface electromyography analysis for variable gait. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[31]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.