Effectiveness of Using Computer-Assisted Supplementary Instruction for Teaching the Mole Concept

This study examined the effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI), used as a problem-solving supplement to classroom instruction, on students' understanding of chemical formulas and mole concept, their attitudes toward chemistry subjects, and CAI. The objective was to assess the effectiveness of CAI over recitation hours when both teaching methods were used as a supplement to the traditional chemistry instruction. We randomly selected two classes in a secondary school. Each teaching strategy was randomly assigned to one class. The experimental group received supplementary instruction delivered via CAI, while the control group received similar instruction through recitation hours. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and t-test. It was found that the students who used the CAI accompanied with lectures scored significantly higher than those who attended recitation hours, in terms of school subject achievement in chemistry and attitudes toward chemistry subjects. In addition, there was a significant improvement in the attitudes of students in the experimental group toward the use of computers in a chemistry course. There was no significant difference between the performances of females versus males in each treatment group.

[1]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Enhancing Chemistry Problem-Solving Achievement Using Problem Categorization. , 1991 .

[2]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1980 .

[3]  Julien Genyea.  Improving students' problem solving skills: a methodical approach for a preparatory chemistry course , 1983 .

[4]  Camille L. Wainwright.  The Effectiveness of a Computer-Assisted Instruction Package in High School Chemistry. , 1989 .

[5]  John M. Boblick.  Writing chemical formulas: A comparison of computer assisted instruction with traditional teaching techniques , 1972 .

[6]  C. S. Cavin,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Attitudes of College Students toward Computers and Chemistry. , 1981 .

[7]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Analyzing difficulties with mole-concept tasks by using familiar analog tasks , 1984 .

[8]  Marie Dence.  Toward Defining the Role of CAI: A Review. , 1980 .

[9]  Milton Chen,et al.  Gender Differences in Adolescents’ Uses of and Attitudes Toward Computers , 1987 .

[10]  Patrick J. Schloss,et al.  The Differential Effect of Learner Control and Feedback in College Students' Performance on CAI Modules , 1988 .

[11]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Computers and the Learning of Biological Concepts: Attitudes and Achievement of Nigerian Students. , 1991 .

[12]  P. Aşkar,et al.  Students’ perceptions of computer assisted instruction environment and their attitudes towards computer assisted learning , 1992 .

[13]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The measurement of the interest in, and attitudes to, laboratory work amongst Israeli high school chemistry students , 1976 .

[14]  Esther R. Steinberg,et al.  Organizational/Memory Tools: A Technique for Improving Problem Solving Skills , 1986 .

[15]  K. Fogelman.  PIAGETIAN TESTS AND SEX DIFFERENCES‐‐II , 1970 .

[16]  J. J. Lagowski,et al.  The impact of computer-based instructional methods in general chemistry , 1973 .

[17]  M. David Merrill.  Learner control in computer based learning , 1980 .

[18]  Michael E. Skinner.  Attitudes of College Students toward Computer-Assisted Instruction: An Essential Variable for Successful Implementation. , 1988 .

[19]  David P. Maloney,et al.  An exploratory, classroom‐based investigation of students' difficulties with subscripts in chemical formulas , 1992 .

[20]  G. P. Kearsely,et al.  Design factors for successful videodisc-based instruction , 1985 .

[21]  Roger A Lewis,et al.  Computer assignments and problems classes for physics students , 1991 .

[22]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Problem‐solving skills of high school chemistry students , 1984 .

[23]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation , 1990 .

[24]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  The effects of different feedback strategies using computer-administered multiple-choice questions as instruction , 1991 .

[25]  A. Lawson.  Sex difference in concrete and formal reasoning ability as measured by manipulative tasks and written tasks , 1975 .

[26]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[27]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  The SPSS guide to data analysis for SPSSx , 1988 .

[28]  Paul B. Hounshell,et al.  The microcomputer and achievement and attitudes in high school biology , 1989 .

[29]  Ronald E. Anderson.  The Unresolved Need for Research on Computers and Education. , 1987 .

[30]  A. Griffiths,et al.  Validation of a Learning Hierarchy for the Mole Concept. , 1983 .

[31]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Secondary Schools. , 1985 .

[32]  D. Woodhouse,et al.  Integrating CAL with other instructional activities in schools , 1988 .

[33]  M. Linn,et al.  Aptitude and Experience Influences on Proportional Reasoning during Adolescence: Focus on Male-Female Differences. , 1983 .

[34]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Effects of Computer Simulations and Problem-Solving Approaches on High School Students , 1992 .

[35]  Marjorie Gardner,et al.  A Study of Tutorial-Type Computer Assisted Instruction in High School Chemistry. , 1973 .

[36]  Byung-Soon Choi,et al.  The Effectiveness of Using Computer Simulated Experiments on Junior High Students' Understanding of the Volume Displacement Concept , 1987 .

[37]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[38]  Claudia S. Cavin,et al.  Effects of Computer Simulated or Laboratory Experiments and Student Aptitude on Achievement and Time in a College General Chemistry Laboratory Course. , 1978 .