New estimation methodology of six complex aerodynamic admittance functions

This paper describes a new method for the estimation of six complex aerodynamic admittance functions. The aerodynamic admittance functions relate buffeting forces to the incoming wind turbulent components, of which the estimation accuracy affects the prediction accuracy of the buffeting response of long-span bridges. There should be two aerodynamic admittance functions corresponding to the longitudinal and vertical turbulent components, respectively, for each gust buffeting force. Therefore, there are six aerodynamic admittance functions in all for the three buffeting forces. Sears function is a complex theoretical expression for the aerodynamic admittance function for a thin airfoil. Similarly, the aerodynamic admittance functions for a bridge deck should also be complex functions. This paper presents a separated frequency-by-frequency method for estimating the six complex aerodynamic admittance functions. A new experimental methodology using an active turbulence generator is developed to measure simultaneously all the six complex aerodynamic admittance functions. Wind tunnel tests of a thin plate model and a streamlined bridge section model are conducted in turbulent flow. The six complex aerodynamic admittance functions, determined by the developed methodology are compared with the Sears functions and Davenport`s formula.

[1]  Fernando A. Branco,et al.  Unbalanced wind buffeting effects on bridges during double cantilever erection stages , 2001 .

[2]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messina suspension bridge , 2004 .

[3]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  Problematics in Formulation of Wind‐Force Models for Bridge Decks , 1993 .

[4]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  MOTION-RELATED BODY-FORCE FUNCTIONS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOW-SPEED FLOW , 2000 .

[5]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Advances in modeling of Aerodynamic forces on bridge decks , 2002 .

[6]  J. Mann,et al.  Gust loading on streamlined bridge decks , 1998 .

[7]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  A FORM OF AERODYNAMIC ADMITTANCE FOR USE IN BRIDGE AEROELASTIC ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[8]  Guy L. Larose,et al.  Direct measurements of buffeting wind forces on bridge decks , 1998 .

[9]  W. H. Melbourne,et al.  The aerodynamic admittance of two-dimensional rectangular section cylinders in smooth flow , 1986 .

[10]  Guy L. Larose,et al.  Performance of streamlined bridge decks in relation to the aerodynamics of a flat plate , 1997 .

[11]  Federica Tubino,et al.  Relationships among aerodynamic admittance functions, flutter derivatives and static coefficients for long-span bridges , 2005 .

[12]  H. Tanaka,et al.  New Estimation Method of Aerodynamic Admittance Function , 2001 .

[13]  Emanuele Zappa,et al.  Complex aerodynamic admittance function role in buffeting response of a bridge deck , 2001 .