Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 36-mm Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene-Minimum Seven-years Follow-up
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. D. Di Cesare,et al. The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. , 2013, American journal of orthopedics.
[2] M. Cho,et al. Femoral Head Size of 36 mm against Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene in Patients Younger than 60 Years: Minimun Three Years of Follow Up , 2012 .
[3] K. Søballe,et al. The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty , 2010, Acta orthopaedica.
[4] T. Wright,et al. High Stress Conditions Do Not Increase Wear of Thin Highly Crosslinked UHMWPE , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[5] P. Lachiewicz,et al. Femoral Head Size and Wear of Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at 5 to 8 Years , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[6] Michael A Mont,et al. Instability after total hip arthroplasty: treatment with large femoral heads vs constrained liners. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[7] Henrik Malchau,et al. Large Diameter Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene: Minimum 3-year Results , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[8] Charles R Bragdon,et al. The measurement of creep in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene: a comparison of conventional versus highly cross-linked polyethylene. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[9] L. Pruitt,et al. Early failure due to osteolysis associated with contemporary highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. A case report. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[10] M. Silva,et al. Short-term in vivo wear of cross-linked polyethylene. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[11] Karl-Heinz Widmer,et al. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[12] R. Barrack,et al. Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Design and Orientation , 2003, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
[13] W. Harris,et al. Femoral head sizes larger than 32 mm against highly cross-linked polyethylene. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[14] C. Engh,et al. Characterization of Long-Term Femoral-Head-Penetration Rates: Association with and Prediction of Osteolysis* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[15] K. Soffe,et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[16] R. Barrack,et al. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[17] C. Engh,et al. Cementless acetabular components. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[18] C. Engh,et al. THE FACTORS GOVERNING BONE INGROWTH, STRESS SHIELDING, AND CLINICAL RESULTS , 1987 .
[19] C. Engh,et al. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.