Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 36-mm Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene-Minimum Seven-years Follow-up

Purpose We evaluate the clinical and radiographic midterm results of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a 36 mm diameter femoral head on highly cross-linked polyethylene (minimum 7-year follow-up). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 73 patients (74 hips) that underwent primary THA with a 36 mm diameter femoral head on highly cross-linked polyethylene between July 2004 and February 2007. Clinical follow-ups included specific measurements like modified Harris hip scores (HHS) and Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score. For radiologic evaluations, together with position of acetabular cup at 6 weeks later of post-operation, we separately calculated the penentrations of femoral heads into polyethylene liners during post-operation and one year later check-ups, and during one year later check-ups and final check-ups. Results There were no complications except for one case of dislocation. Average modified HHS at final follow-up was 88±7.5 (range, 81-96), and Merle d'Aubigne and Postel scores were more than 15 (range, 15-18). Mean acetabular cup inclination and anteversion were 50.1°(range, 35°-58°) and 23.6°(range, 5°-38°), respectively. Average femoral head penetration during the first postoperative year was 0.071±0.034 mm/year, and steady-state wear rate determined using radiographs taken at one-year postoperatively and at latest follow-up was 0.051±0.022 mm/year. Average femoral head penetration during entire follow-ups was 0.058±0.013 mm/year. Conclusion Primary THA with a large diameter femoral head on highly cross-linked polyethylene was found to produce the results comparable to previous in vitro laboratory hip simulation studies. And we also find out good scores in terms of patient's functionality.

[1]  P. D. Di Cesare,et al.  The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. , 2013, American journal of orthopedics.

[2]  M. Cho,et al.  Femoral Head Size of 36 mm against Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene in Patients Younger than 60 Years: Minimun Three Years of Follow Up , 2012 .

[3]  K. Søballe,et al.  The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty , 2010, Acta orthopaedica.

[4]  T. Wright,et al.  High Stress Conditions Do Not Increase Wear of Thin Highly Crosslinked UHMWPE , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Femoral Head Size and Wear of Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at 5 to 8 Years , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Michael A Mont,et al.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty: treatment with large femoral heads vs constrained liners. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  Henrik Malchau,et al.  Large Diameter Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene: Minimum 3-year Results , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Charles R Bragdon,et al.  The measurement of creep in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene: a comparison of conventional versus highly cross-linked polyethylene. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  L. Pruitt,et al.  Early failure due to osteolysis associated with contemporary highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. A case report. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  M. Silva,et al.  Short-term in vivo wear of cross-linked polyethylene. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Karl-Heinz Widmer,et al.  A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  R. Barrack,et al.  Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Design and Orientation , 2003, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[13]  W. Harris,et al.  Femoral head sizes larger than 32 mm against highly cross-linked polyethylene. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  C. Engh,et al.  Characterization of Long-Term Femoral-Head-Penetration Rates: Association with and Prediction of Osteolysis* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  K. Soffe,et al.  Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  R. Barrack,et al.  Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  C. Engh,et al.  Cementless acetabular components. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  C. Engh,et al.  THE FACTORS GOVERNING BONE INGROWTH, STRESS SHIELDING, AND CLINICAL RESULTS , 1987 .

[19]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.