Understanding Perceptual Boundaries in Laparoscopic Surgery

Human perceptual capabilities related to the laparoscopic interaction paradigm are not well known. Its study is important for the design of virtual reality simulators, and for the specification of augmented reality applications that overcome current limitations and provide a supersensing to the surgeon. As part of this work, this article addresses the study of laparoscopic pulling forces. Two definitions are proposed to focalize the problem: the perceptual fidelity boundary, limit of human perceptual capabilities, and the Utile fidelity boundary, that encapsulates the perceived aspects actually used by surgeons to guide an operation. The study is then aimed to define the perceptual fidelity boundary of laparoscopic pulling forces. This is approached with an experimental design in which surgeons assess the resistance against pulling of four different tissues, which are characterized with both in vivo interaction forces and ex vivo tissue biomechanical properties. A logarithmic law of tissue consistency perception is found comparing subjective valorizations with objective parameters. A model of this perception is developed identifying what the main parameters are: the grade of fixation of the organ, the tissue stiffness, the amount of tissue bitten, and the organ mass being pulled. These results are a clear requirement analysis for the force feedback algorithm of a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Finally, some discussion is raised about the suitability of augmented reality applications around this surgical gesture.

[1]  N. P. Reddy,et al.  Forces in Laparoscopic Surgical Tools , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  A. Castellanos,et al.  Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[3]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Metrics for objective Assessment , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[4]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Simulating cheap hardware: a platform for evaluating cost-performance trade-offs in haptic hardware design , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[5]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  G. Picod,et al.  Influence du type des trocarts utilisés en cœlioscopie sur la qualité du mouvement : étude expérimentale du frottement , 2004 .

[7]  P. Lamata,et al.  Tissue consistency perception in laparoscopy to define the level of fidelity in virtual reality simulation , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  Carlos M. Atienza Vicente.  Definición de un modelo para la evaluación y el diseño de sistemas de fijación de raquis en base a métodos analíticos , 2000 .

[9]  G. Picod,et al.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy? , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: Didactic design and technical development , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[11]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  The Role of Simulation Fidelity in Laparoscopic Surgical Training , 2003, MICCAI.

[12]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Skills evaluation in minimally invasive surgery using force/torque signatures , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Haptic interfaces , 2002 .

[14]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  A Virtual Environment Testbed for Training Laparoscopic Surgical Skills , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.