Robustness evaluation of cutting tool maintenance planning for soft ground tunneling projects

Abstract Tunnel boring machines require extensive maintenance and inspection effort to provide a high availability. The cutting tools of the cutting wheel must be changed timely upon reaching a critical condition. While one possible maintenance strategy is to change tools only when it is absolutely necessary, tools can also be changed preventively to avoid further damages. Such different maintenance strategies influence the maintenance duration and the overall project performance. However, determine downtime related to a particular maintenance strategy is still a challenging task. This paper shows an analysis of the robustness to achieve the planned project performance of a maintenance strategy considering uncertainties of wear behavior of the cutting tools. A simulation based analysis is presented, implementing an empirical wear prediction model. Different strategies of maintenance planning are compared by performing a parameter variation study including Monte-Carlo simulations. The maintenance costs are calculated and evaluated with respect to their robustness. Finally, an improved and robust maintenance strategy has been determined.

[1]  Antoine Grall,et al.  On the Assessment of Performance and Robustness of Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies , 2016 .

[2]  Julio C. Martinez.  Methodology for Conducting Discrete-Event Simulation Studies in Construction Engineering and Management , 2010 .

[3]  Michael Alber,et al.  Assessment of the LCPC abrasiveness test from the view of material science / Bewertung des LCPC-Abrasivitätstests aus werkstofftechnischer Sicht , 2015 .

[4]  R. Marler,et al.  The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights , 2010 .

[5]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  Simulation modeling and sensitivity analysis of a tunneling construction project's supply chain , 2011 .

[6]  Sanford Friedenthal,et al.  A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language , 2008 .

[7]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  Unified Modeling Methodology for Construction Simulation , 2002 .

[8]  Kurosch Thuro,et al.  Suggestion of an empirical prognosis model for cutting tool wear of Hydroshield TBM , 2015 .

[9]  Pål Drevland Jakobsen,et al.  Development of the Soft Ground Abrasion Tester (SGAT) to predict TBM tool wear, torque and thrust , 2013 .

[10]  Kurosch Thuro,et al.  Classification of the abrasiveness of soil and rock , 2009 .

[11]  Peter Jankovi.  Agent-based Simulation for Creating Robust Plans and Schedules , 2015 .

[12]  Michael Alber,et al.  The RUB Tunneling Device – A newly developed test method to analyze and determine the wear of excavation tools in soils , 2016 .

[13]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robust Optimization - A Comprehensive Survey , 2007 .

[14]  Donghai Liu,et al.  Schedule Risk Analysis for TBM Tunneling Based on Adaptive CYCLONE Simulation in a Geologic Uncertainty-Aware Context , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[15]  Ulrich Maidl,et al.  Abrasiveness and tool wear in shield tunnelling in soil / Abrasivität und Werkzeugverschleiß beim Schildvortrieb im Lockergestein , 2011 .

[16]  Genichi Taguchi.  System Of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods To Optimize Quality And Minimize Costs , 1987 .

[17]  Samuel T. Ariaratnam,et al.  Simulation modeling techniques for underground infrastructure construction processes , 2007 .

[18]  Markus König,et al.  Assessing maintenance strategies for cutting tool replacements in mechanized tunneling using process simulation , 2017, J. Simulation.

[19]  P. Papalambros,et al.  A NOTE ON WEIGHTED CRITERIA METHODS FOR COMPROMISE SOLUTIONS IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION , 1996 .

[20]  Tanja Clees,et al.  Robustness Measures and Numerical Approximation of the Cumulative Density Function of Response Surfaces , 2014, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[21]  Daniel W. Halpin,et al.  CYCLONE — Method for Modeling Job Site Processes , 1977 .

[22]  Markus König,et al.  Simulation of maintenance strategies in mechanized tunneling , 2016, 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[23]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Krige Combined , 2009, INFORMS J. Comput..

[24]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics , 2005 .

[25]  Werner Theisen,et al.  Excavation tool concepts for TBMs – Understanding the material-dependent response to abrasive wear , 2017 .