Applying the Nottingham Prognostic Index to a Swedish breast cancer population

The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of histopathological grading according to the protocol of Elston/Ellis and the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) to a defined breast cancer population. The NPI is the sum of the individual scores concerning grade, tumour size, and lymph node status, each weighted according to regression coefficients of a Cox proportional hazard analysis and calculated for each individual breast cancer patient. 630 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer diagnosed 1988–91 were retrospectively followed up and their tumours reviewed and graded. A Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed. Grade, lymph node status, and tumour size were statistically significant predictors of survival within the follow up period (median 7.2 years). Similar to NPI, a temporary index (Kalmar Prognostic Index, KPI) was derived and normalised to NPI for comparison (KPI(norm)). NPI and KPI(norm) gave similar prognostic power in spite of the differences of the patient populations from which the 2 indices were derived. Patients with NPI 4 or less had 0.66% breast cancer specific mortality during the follow up time. 14% of the patients with NPI 4.1–5 and 32% of those with an index sum 5.1–6 died from breast cancer during this time. Younger patients tended to have higher grade tumours. We advocate the common use of grade and the NPI in order to increase the comparability of groups of patients receiving different therapies.

[1]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Infiltrating breast carcinoma in patients age 30 years and younger: long term outcome for life, relapse, and second primary tumors. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  R. Blamey,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up , 1992, Histopathology.

[3]  M J Gaffey,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. , 1995, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  O. Stål,et al.  Significance of S-phase fraction and hormone receptor content in the management of young breast cancer patients. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  D. Cox,et al.  Analysis of Survival Data. , 1986 .

[6]  S Friedman,et al.  Prognostic value of histologic grade nuclear components of Scarff‐Bloom‐Richardson (SBR). An improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas , 1989, Cancer.

[7]  H. Bloom.  Prognosis in Carcinoma of the Breast , 1950, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  R. Gelber,et al.  Prognostic significance of tumor grade in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis , 1986, Cancer.

[9]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[10]  S. Pinder,et al.  Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement. , 1995, Human pathology.

[11]  I Persson,et al.  The relation between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  W D Dupont,et al.  Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study , 1994, Cancer.

[14]  Robert B. Greenough,et al.  Varying Degrees of Malignancy in Cancer of the Breast , 1925 .

[15]  L Piana,et al.  Age as a prognostic factor in breast cancer: Relationship to pathologic and biologic features , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[16]  M. Fernö,et al.  Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates. , 1995, Cytometry.

[17]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  H. Bloom.  Further Studies on Prognosis of Breast Carcinoma , 1950, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  B. Asselain,et al.  Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma , 1993, The Lancet.

[20]  D. Hansemann.  Ueber asymmetrische Zelltheilung in Epithelkrebsen und deren biologische Bedeutung , 1890, Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin.

[21]  R. W. Scarff,et al.  THE POSITION OF HISTOLOGY IN THE PROGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST. , 1928 .

[22]  I. O. Ellis,et al.  Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  S Friedman,et al.  The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  R. Blamey,et al.  A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.