Effectiveness of mobile electronic devices in weight loss among overweight and obese populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundMobile electronic devices, such as mobile phones and PDAs, have emerged as potentially useful tools in the facilitation and maintenance of weight loss. While RCTs have demonstrated a positive impact of mobile interventions, the extent to which mobile electronic devices are more effective than usual care methods is still being debated.ResultsElectronic databases were systematically searched for RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of mobile electronic device interventions among overweight and obese adults. Weighted mean difference for change in body weight was the primary outcome. The search strategy yielded 559 citations and of the 108 potentially relevant studies, six met the criteria. A total of 632 participants were included in the six studies reporting a mean change in body weight. Using a random-effects model, the WMD for the effect of using mobile electronic devices on reduction in body weight was −1.09 kg (95% CI −2.12, −0.05). When stratified by the type of mobile electronic device used, it suggests that interventions using mobile phones were effective at achieving weight loss, WMD = −1.78 kg (95% CI −2.92, −0.63).ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that mobile electronic devices have the potential to facilitate weight loss in overweight and obese populations, but further work is needed to understand if these interventions have sustained benefit and how we can make these mHealth tools most effective on a large scale. As the field of healthcare increasingly utilizes novel mobile technologies, the focus must not be on any one specific device but on the best possible use of these tools to measure and understand behavior. As mobile electronic devices continue to increase in popularity and the associated technology continues to advance, the potential for the use of mobile devices in global healthcare is enormous. More RCTs with larger sample sizes need to be conducted to look at the cost-effectiveness, technical and financial feasibility of adapting such mHealth interventions in a real clinical setting.

[1]  W. Riley,et al.  Evaluation of a PDA-based Dietary Assessment and Intervention Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2006, Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

[2]  P. Mechael The Case for mHealth in Developing Countries , 2009, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[3]  Xueli Yang,et al.  Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[4]  Yufei Yuan,et al.  Can wireless text messaging improve adherence to preventive activities? Results of a randomised controlled trial , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  Nicholas D. Gilson,et al.  Measuring and Influencing Physical Activity with Smartphone Technology: A Systematic Review , 2014, Sports Medicine.

[8]  Jerilyn K Allen,et al.  Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. , 2013, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[9]  O. Dale,et al.  Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  H. Cole-Lewis,et al.  Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. , 2010, Epidemiologic reviews.

[11]  Rohina Joshi,et al.  An Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool to Assist Primary Care Providers in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management: Development and Mixed Methods Evaluation , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  C. Toumazou,et al.  Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India: a prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. , 2013, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[13]  N. Barengo,et al.  Weight loss by mobile phone: a 1-year effectiveness study , 2009, Public Health Nutrition.

[14]  Sean P Mullen,et al.  Increasing Physical Activity With Mobile Devices: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  M. Carter,et al.  Adherence to a Smartphone Application for Weight Loss Compared to Website and Paper Diary: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  K. Patrick,et al.  A Text Message–Based Intervention for Weight Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[18]  M. Sevick,et al.  Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[20]  A. Rimpelä,et al.  Orientations in adolescent use of information and communication technology: A digital divide by sociodemographic background, educational career, and health , 2007, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[21]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  T. Chey,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for weight management using text messaging. , 2015, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[23]  P. Cudd,et al.  Interventions employing mobile technology for overweight and obesity: an early systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2012, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[24]  Bryant T Karras,et al.  Mobile eHealth Interventions for Obesity: A Timely Opportunity to Leverage Convergence Trends , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  Shannon J. Lane,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making a Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Effectiveness of Hand Held Computers with Paper Methods for Data Collection , 2006 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[27]  A. Haines,et al.  The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[28]  B. Spring,et al.  Technology Interventions to Curb Obesity: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature , 2012, Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports.

[29]  V. Ostojić,et al.  Improving asthma control through telemedicine: a study of short-message service. , 2005, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[30]  D. Withrow,et al.  The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity , 2011, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[31]  E. Balas,et al.  Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[32]  M. Neve,et al.  Effectiveness of web‐based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta‐analysis , 2010, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[33]  K. Patrick,et al.  Text4Diet: a randomized controlled study using text messaging for weight loss behaviors. , 2012, Preventive medicine.

[34]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.