How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models

The emergence of dynamic visualizations of three‐dimensional (3D) models in anatomy curricula may be an adequate solution for spatial difficulties encountered with traditional static learning, as they provide direct visualization of change throughout the viewpoints. However, little research has explored the interplay between learning material presentation formats, spatial abilities, and anatomical tasks. First, to understand the cognitive challenges a novice learner would be faced with when first exposed to 3D anatomical content, a six‐step cognitive task analysis was developed. Following this, an experimental study was conducted to explore how presentation formats (dynamic vs. static visualizations) support learning of functional anatomy, and affect subsequent anatomical tasks derived from the cognitive task analysis. A second aim was to investigate the interplay between spatial abilities (spatial visualization and spatial relation) and presentation formats when the functional anatomy of a 3D scapula and the associated shoulder flexion movement are learned. Findings showed no main effect of the presentation formats on performances, but revealed the predictive influence of spatial visualization and spatial relation abilities on performance. However, an interesting interaction between presentation formats and spatial relation ability for a specific anatomical task was found. This result highlighted the influence of presentation formats when spatial abilities are involved as well as the differentiated influence of spatial abilities on anatomical tasks. Anat Sci Educ 8: 452–462. © 2015 American Association of Anatomists.

[1]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Anatomy Learning with Virtual Objects , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Cognitive Shape Processing.

[2]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations , 2010 .

[4]  Victor Sholukha,et al.  Development of multimedia learning modules for teaching human anatomy: application to osteology and functional anatomy. , 2003, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[5]  R. Mayer.  Cognitive Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction: An Example of the Two‐Way Street Between Cognition and Instruction , 2002 .

[6]  B. Tversky,et al.  Effect of computer animation on users' performance : A review , 2000 .

[7]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning , 2007, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[8]  T. Höffler.  Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[9]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[10]  Kelly Pedersen.  Supporting Students with Varied Spatial Reasoning Abilities in the Anatomy Classroom , 2012 .

[11]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The expertise reversal effect for sequential presentation in dynamic soccer visualizations. , 2013, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[12]  Piet Kommers,et al.  The role of stereopsis in virtual anatomical learning , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[13]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Computer visualizations: Factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  Mary Hegarty.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning About Physical Systems , 2005 .

[15]  B. Laeng,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[17]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns , 2012 .

[18]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  M. Stieff.  Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science , 2007 .

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[21]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  External and internal representations in multimedia learning , 2003 .

[22]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[23]  Richard Lowe,et al.  External and Internal Representations in Multimedia Learning. Introduction. , 2003 .

[24]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[25]  S. Marks,et al.  The role of three‐dimensional information in health care and medical education: The implications for anatomy and dissection , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[26]  M. G. McGee.  Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Effects of Knowledge and Spatial Ability on Learning from Animation , 2007 .

[28]  Roberto Colom,et al.  Vehicles of spatial ability , 2002 .

[29]  John Sweller,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations , 2009 .

[30]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. , 1999 .

[31]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[32]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Cognitive task analysis , 2009 .

[33]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[34]  Timothy A. Hays,et al.  Spatial Abilities and the Effects of Computer Animation on Short-Term and Long-Term Comprehension , 1996 .

[35]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[36]  K. Rochford.  Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students , 1985, Medical education.

[37]  Germain Bergeron,et al.  Spatial abilities of medical graduates and choice of residency programs , 2015, Anatomical sciences education.

[38]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[39]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Enhancement of Mental Rotation Abilities and Its Effect on Anatomy Learning , 2009, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[40]  Emmanuel Schneider,et al.  Static and Animated Presentations in Learning Dynamic Mechanical Systems. , 2009 .

[41]  Michael C. Pyryt.  Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[42]  Björn B. de Koning,et al.  Facilitating Understanding of Movements in Dynamic Visualizations: an Embodied Perspective , 2011 .

[43]  Mireille Bétrancourt,et al.  Les animations sont-elles vraiment plus efficaces ? , 2000 .

[44]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations - Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Diagrams in the Mind and in the World: Relations between Internal and External Visualizations , 2004, Diagrams.

[47]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Effects of Interactivity and Spatial Ability on the Comprehension of Spatial Relations in a 3D Computer Visualization , 2004 .

[48]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  The Contribution of Dynamic Exploration to Virtual Anatomical Learning , 2011, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[50]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[51]  Geoff Norman,et al.  Learning anatomy: do new computer models improve spatial understanding? , 1999 .

[52]  Carla A. Romney,et al.  Effect of visual–spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[53]  S. Vereza.  Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[54]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .

[55]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in use of external visualisations to perform an internal visualisation task. , 2007 .

[56]  Peter Khooshabeh,et al.  Computerized Representations of 3D Structure: How Spatial Comprehension and Patterns of Interactivity Differ among Learners , 2005, AAAI Spring Symposium: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance.

[57]  K. Fung,et al.  Role of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model in anatomy teaching for advanced learners , 2011, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[58]  B. Wainman,et al.  The relative effectiveness of computer‐based and traditional resources for education in anatomy , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[59]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .

[60]  A. Miyake,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking , 2005 .

[61]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Effectiveness of three‐dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context , 2014, Anatomical sciences education.

[62]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design , 2007 .

[64]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[65]  Timothy D Wilson,et al.  Visuospatial anatomy comprehension: The role of spatial visualization ability and problem‐solving strategies , 2014, Anatomical sciences education.

[66]  David A. Rettinger,et al.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[67]  Matthew Crosby,et al.  Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence , 2014 .

[68]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Getting a Handle on Learning Anatomy with Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics , 2009 .

[69]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[70]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities , 2005 .

[71]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[72]  R. Mayer,et al.  Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .

[73]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/ animation on learning electrochemistry , 2003 .

[74]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Is There Any Real Virtue of Virtual Reality?: The Minor Role of Multiple Orientations in Learning Anatomy from Computers , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.