Novel Kinase Inhibitors by Reshuffling Ligand Functionalities Across the Human Kinome

Protein kinases remain among the most versatile and prospective therapeutic drug targets with currently 15 distinct compounds approved for use in humans and numerous clinical development programs. The vast majority of kinase inhibitors bind at the ATP site. Here we present an integrated workflow to amplify the rapidly increasing space of structurally resolved small molecule kinase ligands to generate novel inhibitors. Our approach considers both receptor-based similarity constraints in cocomplexes and ligand-based filtering/refinement methods to generate novel, drug-like matter. After building a comprehensive database of the structural kinome and identifying ATP-competitive ligands, we leverage local site similarities and site alignments to shuffle ligand fragments across the kinome. After extensive curation and standardization, our automated protocol starting from 936 cocrystal ATP-competitive binding sites generated about 150,000 new ligand structures among them over 26,000 lead-/drug-like compounds; the majority of those are novel based on structural similarity and scaffolds. In a retrospective analysis we demonstrate that our protocol produced known potent kinase inhibitors and we show how docking can be applied to prioritize the most likely efficacious compounds. Our workflow emulates a common strategy in medicinal chemistry to identify and swap corresponding moieties from known inhibitors to generate novel and potent leads. Here, we systematize and automate this approach leveraging available knowledge covering the entire human Kinome.

[1]  N. Gray,et al.  Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  Mindy I. Davis,et al.  A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  G. Bemis,et al.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  E. Casale,et al.  Through the "gatekeeper door": exploiting the active kinase conformation. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Theonie Anastassiadis,et al.  Comprehensive assay of kinase catalytic activity reveals features of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2011, Nature biotechnology.

[6]  A. Leach,et al.  Molecular complexity and fragment-based drug discovery: ten years on. , 2011, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[7]  G. Klebe,et al.  A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Arup K. Ghose,et al.  Knowledge Based Prediction of Ligand Binding Modes and Rational Inhibitor Design for Kinase Drug Discovery , 2008 .

[9]  D. Lenihan,et al.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: can promising new therapy associated with cardiac toxicity strengthen the concept of teamwork? , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Maurizio Botta,et al.  Protein Kinases: Docking and Homology Modeling Reliability , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  T. Hunter,et al.  The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[12]  Ian A. Watson,et al.  Kinase inhibitor data modeling and de novo inhibitor design with fragment approaches. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  M. Murcko,et al.  Kinase-likeness and kinase-privileged fragments: toward virtual polypharmacology. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  P. Cohen Protein kinases — the major drug targets of the twenty-first century? , 2002, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[16]  N. Gray,et al.  Rational design of inhibitors that bind to inactive kinase conformations , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[17]  Stephan C Schürer,et al.  Knowledge-based characterization of similarity relationships in the human protein-tyrosine phosphatase family for rational inhibitor design. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  P. Zarrinkar,et al.  High-throughput kinase profiling as a platform for drug discovery , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[19]  K. Shokat,et al.  Targeting the cancer kinome through polypharmacology , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[20]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Darren R. Flower,et al.  On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[22]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  S. Knapp,et al.  The (un)targeted cancer kinome. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[24]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[25]  Heikki Joensuu,et al.  Practical management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated side effects in GIST. , 2011, Cancer treatment reviews.

[26]  Dragos Horvath,et al.  Fragment-based drug design: computational & experimental state of the art. , 2011, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[27]  G. Bemis,et al.  BREED: Generating novel inhibitors through hybridization of known ligands. Application to CDK2, p38, and HIV protease. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  Mindy I. Davis,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[30]  Irini Akritopoulou-Zanze,et al.  Kinase-targeted libraries: the design and synthesis of novel, potent, and selective kinase inhibitors. , 2009, Drug discovery today.