The impact of auditory feedback on neuronavigation

Summary.Object. We aimed to develop an auditory feedback system to be used in addition to regular neuronavigation, in an attempt to improve the usefulness of the information offered by neuronavigation systems.Instrumentation. Using a serial connection, instrument co-ordinates determined by a commercially available neuronavigation system were transferred to a laptop computer. Based on preoperative segmentation of the images, the software on the laptop computer produced an audible signal whenever the instrument moved into an area the surgeon wanted to avoid.Methods. To evaluate the impact of our setup on volumetric resections, phantom experiments were conducted. CT scans were acquired from eight blocks of floral foam. In each of these scans, a target-volume was segmented. This target-volume was subsequently resected using either regular neuronavigation or neuronavigation extended with auditory feedback. A ‘postoperative’ CT scan was used to compare the resection cavity to the preoperatively planned target-volume.Findings. The resemblance between the resection cavity and the target-volume was greater each time auditory feedback had been used. This corresponded with more complete removal of the target-volume. However, it also corresponded with the removal of more non-target ‘tissue’ in two out of four cases.Conclusions. The usefulness of auditory feedback was made plausible and the use of a new type of navigation phantom was illustrated. Based on these results, we recommend incorporation of auditory feedback in commercially available neuronavigation systems, especially since this is relatively inexpensive.

[1]  J. Patrick Intraoperative Brain Shift and Deformation: A Quantitative Analysis of Cortical Displacement in 28 Cases , 1998 .

[2]  A Thron,et al.  Three-dimensional Visualization of the Pyramidal Tract in a Neuronavigation System during Brain Tumor Surgery: First Experiences and Technical Note , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[3]  J. Haase Image-guided neurosurgery/neuronavigation/the SurgiScope--reflexions on a theme. , 1999, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[4]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Co-Registration of Function and Anatomy in Frameless Stereotaxy by Contour Fitting , 2003, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[5]  C. Lumenta,et al.  BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[6]  D B Karron,et al.  Audio-guided blind biopsy needle placement. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[7]  J. Maldjian,et al.  Functional image-guided surgery of intracranial tumors located in or near the sensorimotor cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  I. Germano,et al.  Clinical use of the optical digitizer for intracranial neuronavigation. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[9]  Bernard Gibaud,et al.  Integration of sulcal and functional information for multimodal neuronavigation. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  W. Harkness,et al.  Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Quantification of, Visualization of, and Compensation for Brain Shift Using Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[12]  C. Matula,et al.  Frameless stereotactic lesion contour-guided surgery using a computer-navigated microscope. , 1998, Surgical neurology.

[13]  J. Strohbehn,et al.  A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope. , 1986, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  L. Smith,et al.  Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Investigation of intraoperative brain deformation using a 1.5-T interventional MR system: preliminary results , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  M. Y. Wang,et al.  Measurement of Intraoperative Brain Surface Deformation Under a Craniotomy , 1998, MICCAI.